LIFE
Moderators: honeev, Leonid, amiradm, BioTeam
- CoolJay221
- Death Adder
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 3:57 pm
- Location: America New York
- Contact:
LIFE
Is it true that all life came from a single and the same ancester
ANY GIRLS WANT TO TALK?
PM me to find out my personal!
Also My site!!!!!
http://napoleon.forumup.org/index.php?mforum=napoleon
PM me to find out my personal!
Also My site!!!!!
http://napoleon.forumup.org/index.php?mforum=napoleon
- chicoguardian
- Coral
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 12:18 pm
- Contact:
- victor
- King Cobra
- Posts: 2668
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 12:01 pm
- Location: Yogyakarta, Indonesia..
- Contact:
Re: LIFE
CoolJay221 wrote:Is it true that all life came from a single and the same ancester
according to me, yes...singularity.
Q: Why are chemists great for solving problems?
A: They have all the solutions.
A: They have all the solutions.
-
- Death Adder
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 11:19 am
apparently all humans originally evolved in africa too, intrestin huh?
cos thats were our closest buddies are
only 2.4% genetic difference between us and chimps!!!
and yes we all evolved from a kind of prokaryotic cell in which had a single strand of circlular DNA
we've come along way since then
now where the good old eurkaryotic cells with fully defined organelles with there only membranes rather than the mess that are bacteria with everything all mixed together!
cos thats were our closest buddies are
only 2.4% genetic difference between us and chimps!!!
and yes we all evolved from a kind of prokaryotic cell in which had a single strand of circlular DNA
we've come along way since then

now where the good old eurkaryotic cells with fully defined organelles with there only membranes rather than the mess that are bacteria with everything all mixed together!
- playboy bunny
- Garter
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 5:04 pm
- Location: southampton
- AstusAleator
- King Cobra
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:51 pm
- Location: Oregon, USA
If conditions were just right to form the initial self replicating ribozyme-ish molecules and their accomanying lipid vessicles, I think that the possibility of simultaneous formation of many of these proto-cells is more probable than the formation of only one and that one surviving long enough to produce an entire evolutionary lineage. The initial presence of many proto-cells would increase the chance of survival. The evolution of sexual reproduction, or at least evolution of mechanisms for injecting and splicing genetic materials, would further increase the chances of survival by having a larger base genome. There's my hypothesis.
geneticaly we are from one common ancestor.
And they were not apes.
And they were not apes.
"How far you go in life depends on your being tender with the young, compassionate with the aged, sympathetic with the striving and tolerant of the weak and strong. Because someday in life you will have been all of these".
~ George washington Carver
~ George washington Carver
- AstusAleator
- King Cobra
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:51 pm
- Location: Oregon, USA
No one is going to argue against my multiple ancestral proto-cell hypothesis?
Linn, when you're talking about a single ancestor are you talking about the ancestor of homonids? Or of all life?
If you're going to talk about ancestors of individual clades or phylogenetic trees, then there have been cases multiple organisms forming new phylogenetic trees. Take hybridization and endosymbiosis for example.
Linn, when you're talking about a single ancestor are you talking about the ancestor of homonids? Or of all life?
If you're going to talk about ancestors of individual clades or phylogenetic trees, then there have been cases multiple organisms forming new phylogenetic trees. Take hybridization and endosymbiosis for example.
AstusAleator wrote:If conditions were just right to form the initial self replicating ribozyme-ish molecules and their accomanying lipid vessicles, I think that the possibility of simultaneous formation of many of these proto-cells is more probable than the formation of only one and that one surviving long enough to produce an entire evolutionary lineage. The initial presence of many proto-cells would increase the chance of survival. The evolution of sexual reproduction, or at least evolution of mechanisms for injecting and splicing genetic materials, would further increase the chances of survival by having a larger base genome. There's my hypothesis.
how would the conditions be just right?
PS:
thanx for the clarification
all life began each according to their kind as stated in creationism.
"How far you go in life depends on your being tender with the young, compassionate with the aged, sympathetic with the striving and tolerant of the weak and strong. Because someday in life you will have been all of these".
~ George washington Carver
~ George washington Carver
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests