Which came first the DNA, RNA or protein

Discussion of all aspects of biological molecules, biochemical processes and laboratory procedures in the field.

Moderators: honeev, Leonid, amiradm, BioTeam

User avatar
Nite
Death Adder
Death Adder
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 1:02 pm
Location: blue planet

Post by Nite » Tue Jan 03, 2006 5:25 pm

i would think that it's protein since amino acid has smaller structure than nucleotides...
if it were to be protein, perhaps earliest form of entity to exist are something similar to prions??

Ultrashogun
Coral
Coral
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 4:48 am

Post by Ultrashogun » Wed Jan 04, 2006 7:56 am

The Hypercycle theory explains this, it says that Nucleotids formed because of organic molecules in the primordial atmosphere combined to form small RNA molecules which catalysed, like ribozymes, the formation of more RNA.

So I guess it was the RNA because it can function as an enzyme on top of storing information.

User avatar
victor
King Cobra
King Cobra
Posts: 2668
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 12:01 pm
Location: Yogyakarta, Indonesia..
Contact:

Post by victor » Wed Jan 04, 2006 1:23 pm

Nite wrote:if it were to be protein, perhaps earliest form of entity to exist are something similar to prions??


For Prions, you forget one thing....it's "infectious" word...Prions are kind like an infectious proteins that synthesized by the cell itself...
Q: Why are chemists great for solving problems?
A: They have all the solutions.

reem
Garter
Garter
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:05 pm

Post by reem » Thu Jan 05, 2006 10:18 pm

well..........
i think after the discovery of a human cell (old one 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 years ago :shock: )

evolution is not longer considerd any more ! :roll:

User avatar
MrMistery
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
Posts: 6832
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Romania(small and unimportant country)
Contact:

Post by MrMistery » Fri Jan 06, 2006 9:07 pm

what human cell? i don't know of anyone that old..
"As a biologist, I firmly believe that when you're dead, you're dead. Except for what you live behind in history. That's the only afterlife" - J. Craig Venter

User avatar
alextemplet
King Cobra
King Cobra
Posts: 5599
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 4:50 pm
Location: South Louisiana (aka Cajun Country)
Contact:

Post by alextemplet » Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:35 pm

I think someone forgot to take his finger of the "0" button . . . :shock:

User avatar
Dr.Stein
King Cobra
King Cobra
Posts: 3501
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 7:58 am
Location: 55284 Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Contact:

Post by Dr.Stein » Sat Jan 07, 2006 7:39 am

Viewed from the protein synthesis - DNA is a template for RNA, then RNA will initiate the protein synthesis

Viewed from the evolution - amino acid was created at the first time as a major component of organism (Oparin) but this still a theory since none able to prove on creating a organism from ancient components as mentioned by Oparin.

So...?
Image

reem
Garter
Garter
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:05 pm

Post by reem » Sat Jan 07, 2006 12:31 pm

will i dont think my molecular biology doctor was lying to the whole class :?

they found this cell and measure its radiation and found out that its a very old cell :!:

and researches are still on it !

:)

User avatar
victor
King Cobra
King Cobra
Posts: 2668
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 12:01 pm
Location: Yogyakarta, Indonesia..
Contact:

Post by victor » Sat Jan 07, 2006 12:48 pm

I also have some difficulities finding the related references in my Microbiology book: cell's ancestor.
Q: Why are chemists great for solving problems?
A: They have all the solutions.

User avatar
MrMistery
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
Posts: 6832
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Romania(small and unimportant country)
Contact:

Post by MrMistery » Sat Jan 07, 2006 8:06 pm

a human cell that old? where did they find it? and how did they decide it was human and how did they decide it was that old? Tell your professor to give a reference or people will probably think he is insane
"As a biologist, I firmly believe that when you're dead, you're dead. Except for what you live behind in history. That's the only afterlife" - J. Craig Venter

reem
Garter
Garter
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:05 pm

Post by reem » Sat Jan 07, 2006 9:27 pm

i will as soon as he come back from France :)

pitch
Garter
Garter
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 6:11 pm

Post by pitch » Sat Jan 07, 2006 9:57 pm

My opinion is that the first wich appeared necessarily need to have at the same time an informative fonction and a catalic fonction, although RNA hasn't a high stability, it is for me the most serious candidate. :wink:

If the subjet interest you I advice you to read, a conceptually marvellous book: The Selfish Gene,2nd Ed. by Richard Dawkins

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests