mutations and dependencies

Discussion of everything related to the Theory of Evolution.

Moderators: Leonid, amiradm, BioTeam

Cat
King Cobra
King Cobra
Posts: 635
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:40 pm

Post by Cat » Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:22 pm

Amphibitile is right. I only wanted to add that "allo-" means "other" organism of the same species (non-self).

RabbitPhilosopher
Garter
Garter
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 9:00 pm

Post by RabbitPhilosopher » Tue Jun 25, 2013 4:34 pm

Cat and Amphibitile,

Thanks

thoffnagle
Garter
Garter
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:10 pm

Re: Re:

Post by thoffnagle » Mon Jul 01, 2013 5:42 pm

Cat wrote:Did you read this article??? It does not say ANYTHING about adding new genetic information.


Taylor and Raes (2004) wrote a good reviews of this topic nearly ten years ago:

http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10 ... 902.092831

You can get a pdf version here:

http://www.reed.edu/biology/professors/ ... s_2004.pdf
"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution."
Theodosius Dobzhansky
"Most people who hate the idea of evolution do so because if it was working properly, they'd be dead."
Anonymous

Cat
King Cobra
King Cobra
Posts: 635
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:40 pm

Post by Cat » Thu Jul 04, 2013 4:54 pm

I already said in another post that this article has no PROOF of anything. Reading a long summary of other people's conclusions does not help...

thoffnagle
Garter
Garter
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:10 pm

Re:

Post by thoffnagle » Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:11 pm

Cat wrote:I already said in another post that this article has no PROOF of anything. Reading a long summary of other people's conclusions does not help...


The idea is that this one review paper provides citations to the primary research - I was trying to make it easy for you.
"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution."
Theodosius Dobzhansky
"Most people who hate the idea of evolution do so because if it was working properly, they'd be dead."
Anonymous

Cat
King Cobra
King Cobra
Posts: 635
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:40 pm

Re: Re:

Post by Cat » Sat Jul 13, 2013 1:20 am

thoffnagle wrote:
Cat wrote:I already said in another post that this article has no PROOF of anything. Reading a long summary of other people's conclusions does not help...


The idea is that this one review paper provides citations to the primary research - I was trying to make it easy for you.


Do an exercise - trace the actual facts. If you find any direct proof, please, post. I would expect that you will find quite a bit of chain referencing...

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests