Flaws of Life in a Tube

Discussion of everything related to the Theory of Evolution.

Moderators: honeev, Leonid, amiradm, BioTeam

Gavin
Coral
Coral
Posts: 108
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:44 am

Re: Flaws of Life in a Tube

Post by Gavin » Sun Nov 06, 2011 3:52 am

As I and others have said, debate with ignorant people is futile and not worth our time.

User avatar
Tomn
Death Adder
Death Adder
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 am

Post by Tomn » Sun Nov 06, 2011 4:06 am

Go eat pie.

Why are you even here then? If its pointless to debate, you should just get out.

Leave.

You dont belong in a forum designed for debate.
-facts, observed events, plausible explanations, and solid evidence

Gavin
Coral
Coral
Posts: 108
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:44 am

Re:

Post by Gavin » Sun Nov 06, 2011 4:07 am

Tomn wrote:Why are you even here then?


My functions are to help people who seek answers to questions about evolution and to be an antibiotic against infections.

Niklas
Garter
Garter
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 8:28 pm

Re: Flaws of Life in a Tube

Post by Niklas » Fri Apr 13, 2012 8:44 pm

When Miller died, scientists reexamined the preserved original vials from the experiment, and they found more than 20 different amino acids.

what is your view on these articles I found recently?
The original box containing archived spark discharge samples prepared by Stanley Miller in 1958. For unknown reasons, Miller never analyzed these even though this is his first experiment using hydrogen sulfide.

In the new research, the team analyzed samples from another variant of the experiment performed in 1958 in which Miller used carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide gas in the mixture. It was "lost" for decades because, for unknown reasons, Miller never reported his analysis of the results.

Stanley mentioned to several of us that he hated working with hydrogen sulfide because it smelled so bad and tended to make him sick," says Bada. "Given that some of the compounds he made in the experiment smell pretty bad, this experiment may be the basis for his reluctance to deal with H2S in experiments."

JorgeLobo
Coral
Coral
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:12 am

Post by JorgeLobo » Sat Apr 14, 2012 1:25 am

Could you offer references for the findings you mentione?

User avatar
canalon
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
Posts: 3909
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: Canada

Post by canalon » Sat Apr 14, 2012 6:14 pm

Patrick

Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests