Help w/ interpretatiobn of a nice article ? Deep Phylogeny
Moderators: honeev, Leonid, amiradm, BioTeam
Help w/ interpretatiobn of a nice article ? Deep Phylogeny
http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/ ... 7/111.full
This article seems to be touching on things I've been trying to "put my finger on"...but I'm not sure.
Anyhow, if you like it, please leave a note on what you thought was good and what it means !
I'm working on giving better questions, too...
Thanks
This article seems to be touching on things I've been trying to "put my finger on"...but I'm not sure.
Anyhow, if you like it, please leave a note on what you thought was good and what it means !
I'm working on giving better questions, too...
Thanks
Re:
OK, Darby .Thank you very much for taking the time !Darby wrote:It's a decent historical review of major taxonomic distinctions that aren't necessarily as universally accepted as the article suggests.
I thought so too, and the particular interests are what I'm going to pursue a bit further. I might have some specific questions when I am stuck
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests