bacteria vs. archaea

About microscopic forms of life, including Bacteria, Archea, protozoans, algae and fungi. Topics relating to viruses, viroids and prions also belong here.

Moderators: honeev, Leonid, amiradm, BioTeam

Post Reply
User avatar
[email protected]
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 9:52 am

bacteria vs. archaea

Post by [email protected] » Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:29 am

Hey, anyone knows the differences and similarities between bacteria and archaea??? Second, some scientists believe archaea are more closely related to eukaryotes then prokaryotes do you agree/disagre? :cry:

User avatar
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
Posts: 6832
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Romania(small and unimportant country)

Post by MrMistery » Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:35 pm

For the first question:
-both are procaryotes(and everything that this includes)
-the DNA of Archea has introns
-the 16S ribosomal RNA in the small subunit of Archea ribosoms resembles more to the 18S rRNA of eukaryotes that the 16S of bacteria
-the lack of murein in the cell wall of Archea, when it is present
-the very different composition of lipids in the cell membrane
-different behaviour towards toxins and antibiotics

For the second question. It does not really matter if i or another member on the forum agrees/disagrees. We are scientists and the only thing influencing our decision should be facts, not opinions. Scientists formulated this statement on facts, some of them presented by me above, and we should aknoledge their decision
"As a biologist, I firmly believe that when you're dead, you're dead. Except for what you live behind in history. That's the only afterlife" - J. Craig Venter

User avatar
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
Posts: 5345
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 8:14 pm
Location: Nashville, TN

Post by mith » Sun Aug 14, 2005 9:20 pm

Eubacteria only-
Peptidoglycan in cell wall.
Simple RNA polymerase
Living one day at a time;
Enjoying one moment at a time;
Accepting hardships as the pathway to peace;

Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:55 pm

Post by mmantle7 » Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:02 pm

I believe the conventional view is that eukaryotes evolved from archea (with the exception of the mitochondria and chloroplasts which were originally seperate bacteria that engaged in symbiosis with a eukaryote cell).

User avatar
King Cobra
King Cobra
Posts: 2668
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 12:01 pm
Location: Yogyakarta, Indonesia..

Post by victor » Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:16 pm

hey, is it true that some bacteria now have organelles?
Q: Why are chemists great for solving problems?
A: They have all the solutions.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests