RNeasy: B-Me vs. DTT

Discussion of all aspects of biological molecules, biochemical processes and laboratory procedures in the field.

Moderators: honeev, Leonid, amiradm, BioTeam

Post Reply
biznatch
Garter
Garter
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Canada

RNeasy: B-Me vs. DTT

Post by biznatch » Tue Jul 27, 2010 4:01 pm

I just discovered that the QIAGEN RNeasy protocol says you can substitute DTT for B-Me in Buffer RLT for the elimination of RNases, but this only applies to isolation of RNA from animal tissue, not animal cells, yeast, plants, etc. This would be great since we use animal tissue, and it would mean we don't have to do the first few steps in the hood. Does anyone know if there are any drawback to using DTT instead of B-Me, and why this substitution apparently only applies to animal tissue?
thanks!

User avatar
JackBean
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
Posts: 5694
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:12 pm

Post by JackBean » Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:13 pm

they both smell pretty much, so if you work with one in the hood, you should work with the other as well.
http://www.biolib.cz/en/main/

Cis or trans? That's what matters.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests