Debate and discussion of any biological questions not pertaining to a particular topic.

Moderators: honeev, Leonid, amiradm, BioTeam

Post Reply
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 9:17 pm


Post by red.ninja13 » Sat Apr 11, 2009 12:59 pm

I have conducted an experiment using spearmans rank. since my critical value was greater then my resulting ''rs'' number, i have to accept the null hypothesis.

Does this mean i have to totally reject my hypothesis, and cant comment on any biological information to support it?

User avatar
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
Posts: 6832
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Romania(small and unimportant country)

Post by MrMistery » Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:39 pm

well, what was your null hypothesis?
"As a biologist, I firmly believe that when you're dead, you're dead. Except for what you live behind in history. That's the only afterlife" - J. Craig Venter

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: yivafvsLIVE2019 and 9 guests