Question about RNA viruses

Genetics as it applies to evolution, molecular biology, and medical aspects.

Moderators: honeev, Leonid, amiradm, BioTeam

Post Reply
halloooo
Garter
Garter
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 2:45 pm

Question about RNA viruses

Post by halloooo » Sun Mar 29, 2009 2:53 pm

I encountered this question on yahoo and found it rather interesting.

Do viruses follow the central dogma.
Last edited by halloooo on Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
canalon
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
Posts: 3909
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: Canada

Post by canalon » Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:01 pm

Depends.
Class III to V in the Baltimore classification system are basically following what was known as the central dogma. But the class VI (retroviruses) proved that the central dogma was an oversimplification, and not always true.
Patrick

Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)

yakowon
Garter
Garter
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:47 pm

Re: Question about RNA viruses

Post by yakowon » Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:51 pm

-----------------
Last edited by yakowon on Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:59 am, edited 1 time in total.

halloooo
Garter
Garter
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 2:45 pm

Re: Question about RNA viruses

Post by halloooo » Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:49 pm

So is there any difference between the genes and proteins of retroviruses and eukaryote?

User avatar
MrMistery
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
Posts: 6832
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Romania(small and unimportant country)
Contact:

Post by MrMistery » Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:10 pm

well genes and proteins of viruses are usually different of those of eukaryotes, except that there are retrovirus-like transposons in the eukaryotic genomes (at least in the human genome, I don't know about most other EKs). Your question is confusing
"As a biologist, I firmly believe that when you're dead, you're dead. Except for what you live behind in history. That's the only afterlife" - J. Craig Venter

User avatar
canalon
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
Posts: 3909
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: Canada

Post by canalon » Wed Apr 01, 2009 4:17 pm

OK The central dogma was:
Genetic Info is stored as DNA then transcribed in mRNA and finally translated in protein. This is a one way sequence.
Now open your textbook on RNA viruses and look how they store the genetic information (that should be obvious) and how the protein are produced. You will see that the answers are slightly different for the different classes of RNA viruses, but that for dsRNA, +ssRNA and -ssRNA are a bit off the archetypal model, but still following the basic rule of the (now outdated) central dogma, that is the unique direction of the flow of the genetic information. However the last class (retroviruses) proved that even that rule was not universal. I let you find the details.
Patrick

Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)

User avatar
LifeTein
Garter
Garter
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 4:24 pm
Location: NJ

Post by LifeTein » Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:02 pm

I agree with canalon about the central dogma. The dogma will not be universal as we have deeper knowledge about viruses. Viruses are small. But definitely it is one of the most mysterious life forms in the world.
James Chou, Ph.D.
http://www.lifetein.com
Understanding Life One Protein at a time...
The Peptide Synthesis Service Company...

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest