Sasquatch

Debate and discussion of any biological questions not pertaining to a particular topic.

Moderators: honeev, Leonid, amiradm, BioTeam

Post Reply
User avatar
February Beetle
King Cobra
King Cobra
Posts: 690
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 2:47 am
Location: Kansas
Contact:

Sasquatch

Post by February Beetle » Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:11 pm

http://dsc.discovery.com/news/slideshows/bigfoot.html

#1 he isn't in the fossil record
I have a huge problem with this. Don't we assume many things aren't in the fossil record, that is how we believe in evolution, because we believe there is a lot the fossil record leaves out. This is something I was taught in many intro bio classes, it is difficult to make a fossil.

Maybe I am missing something, maybe we have found fossil records for every single extant organism and that is why they are so bold to use lack of a fossil as dis-proof?
Image

Man in civilization surveys the creature through the glass of his knowledge and sees thereby a feather magnified and the whole image in distortion. - Henry Benson

User avatar
alextemplet
King Cobra
King Cobra
Posts: 5599
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 4:50 pm
Location: South Louisiana (aka Cajun Country)
Contact:

Post by alextemplet » Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:14 pm

I agree that the fossil record is far from complete, but I would think that we would've discovered something at least similar to indicate the presence of large apes in North America. So far, the only ape fossils ever discovered in the Americas have been humans. Lack of fossils isn't complete disproof but it's cause for skepticism, at least.
Generally speaking, the more people talk about "being saved," the further away they actually are from true salvation.

~Alex
#2 Total Post Count

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests