Debate and discussion of any biological questions not pertaining to a particular topic.

Moderators: honeev, Leonid, amiradm, BioTeam

Post Reply
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 9:40 pm


Post by monkeyfromsainsburys » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:09 pm

is the calculation of ‘relative risk’ useful to an epidemiologist? Lets discuss , I cannot see that it is , i found to be able to use it, every other aspect needs to be measurable .
Does it give a more accurate figure relating to certain diseases?

User avatar
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
Posts: 5345
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 8:14 pm
Location: Nashville, TN

Post by mith » Sat Jul 19, 2008 7:02 am

The EPA gives an estimate on human life. If the costs of the disease afflicting human life is more than funding needed to fix it, then usually they'll fund it. Otherwise you have pretty much "orphan" diseases...except of course the EPA deals with pollution but I'm sure there's something similar for other agencies.
Living one day at a time;
Enjoying one moment at a time;
Accepting hardships as the pathway to peace;

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests