Discussion of all aspects of biological molecules, biochemical processes and laboratory procedures in the field.

Moderator: BioTeam

Gumber
Garter
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:40 pm

Ok, this may be a very stupid and simple question, but nevertheless I still need an answer. Why is it that the chemical formula of Glucose (C6H12O6) has 6 Carbon atoms, 12 Hydrogen and 6 Oxygen atoms, but when I actually look at the macromolecule in a 3d structure I can only see ONE Carbon atom, 12 Hydrogen atoms and 6 Oxygen atoms?

Like I said before this is probably a very simple question, but I have stagnated at this point, as I cannot continue my work until I grasp this idea and figure out this problem.

Any help would be greatly appreciated and very well recieved.

P.S. I am doing a Gr.12 course so please keep this answer simple.
Last edited by Gumber on Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

mith
Inland Taipan
Posts: 5345
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 8:14 pm
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:
which 3d structure? a screen shot would be helpful.
Living one day at a time;
Enjoying one moment at a time;
Accepting hardships as the pathway to peace;
~Niebuhr

Gumber
Garter
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:40 pm

Right, sorry bout that...

Here it is !
Attachments
Image3.jpg

blcr11
Viper
Posts: 672
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:23 am

Your problem comes from not being familiar with the different ways to represent chemical structures. You’ve got a distorted Haworth projection of the cyclic or pyranose form of glucose. There are carbon atoms at each vertex of the hexagon (except the one occupied by an oxygen atom). If you count the vertices as one carbon each and add to that count the explicit carbon atom, you should get 6. Try the open, linear formula:

http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm/vchembook/543glucose.html

Cat
King Cobra
Posts: 635
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:40 pm
Each cross represents a carbon. See fig with C filled in:

http://www.turf.uiuc.edu/hort436/images/glucose.gif

blcr11
Viper
Posts: 672
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:23 am
Not really to answer the question, which has already been done, I think, but as "macromolecules" go, glucose isn't very macro. It only has a molecular weight of 180. From the title you gave the thread, I thought it was going to be a question about proteins, which typically have thousands of atoms of carbon, oxygen and nitrogen, not to mention a few sulfurs and miscellaneous metals and phosphorus. Your question really was about how to interpret a molecular formula. That's fine. I'm not meaning to criticize you. Now you know.

MichaelXY
King Cobra
Posts: 885
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 7:03 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca
Contact:
Hmm 180 MW is small, since that is the same as 1 mole of tantalum. My question is, at what MW would you consider macro?

mith
Inland Taipan
Posts: 5345
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 8:14 pm
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:
2000
Living one day at a time;
Enjoying one moment at a time;
Accepting hardships as the pathway to peace;
~Niebuhr

MichaelXY
King Cobra
Posts: 885
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 7:03 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca
Contact: