RAW 264.7 Macrophages

Discussion of all aspects of biological molecules, biochemical processes and laboratory procedures in the field.

Moderators: honeev, Leonid, amiradm, BioTeam

Post Reply
User avatar
Katy_Bobbles
Garter
Garter
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 4:23 pm
Location: Glasgow

RAW 264.7 Macrophages

Post by Katy_Bobbles » Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:06 pm

I've been doing my honours project and would like to know if RAW stands for anything. I know they are murine macrophages but I wondered if the RAW part is relevant??

:)

blcr11
Viper
Viper
Posts: 672
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:23 am

Post by blcr11 » Mon Nov 05, 2007 5:53 pm

I kind of doubt the RAW tells you anything much about the cell line, though I can’t be certain. The original line was described in a 1978 Cell paper. The first author was W.C. Raschke and one of the other authors was P. Ralph. Derivation of the line involved infecting mice with Abelson murine leukemia virus (which often makes a defective sarcoma virus as well) and collection of the initial tumors sometimes involved harvesting ascites fluids. It could be as simple as Ralph and William’s cell line 264.7-or almost anything else. I can’t think of any reasonable biological reason to call the cell line “RAW”. Raschke is still around. He’s a faculty member at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center in San Diego. You could write him and ask if you want to go to the horse’s mouth.

User avatar
Katy_Bobbles
Garter
Garter
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 4:23 pm
Location: Glasgow

Post by Katy_Bobbles » Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:25 pm

Thanks again bcr11. I just wondered in case it was relevant and I had to write about it. I'm not that desperate to know so I'll just leave it at that. If I have to find out at least I'll know who to write to. :)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests