Is DNA fingerprinting reliable ?

Genetics as it applies to evolution, molecular biology, and medical aspects.

Moderators: honeev, Leonid, amiradm, BioTeam

Post Reply
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 11:36 am

Is DNA fingerprinting reliable ?

Post by angelyn1985 » Mon Sep 24, 2007 11:59 am

is it really a perfect method in fields like forensic science?
Does it do no mistakes ? I am just wondering. :?

User avatar
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
Posts: 6832
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Romania(small and unimportant country)

Post by MrMistery » Mon Sep 24, 2007 3:00 pm

if you don't screw up the protocol, theoretically it is very reliable.
"As a biologist, I firmly believe that when you're dead, you're dead. Except for what you live behind in history. That's the only afterlife" - J. Craig Venter

Posts: 1278
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 5:29 pm
Location: New York, USA

Post by Darby » Mon Sep 24, 2007 7:34 pm

The odds of a mistake seem remote, but the testing for varied ethnic groups has been spotty (the developers are sure it doesn't matter, but they don't actually have data), and the issue of relatedness is not as well-researched as it could be - there should be a clear distinction between family members, but is that well supported by broad evidence-?

Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:20 am

Post by wbla3335 » Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:49 am

Fingerprinting provides probability estimates. The more loci you examine, and the higher the variability of each locus in the population, the better the fingerprinting reliability will be.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests