altruism

Debate and discussion of any biological questions not pertaining to a particular topic.

Moderators: honeev, Leonid, amiradm, BioTeam

Post Reply
User avatar
Inuyasha
Coral
Coral
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:15 pm
Location: NEW YORK
Contact:

altruism

Post by Inuyasha » Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:18 pm

Do you think that it is better for homo sapiens and other creatures to have creatures who practice altruism or not? Explain.
Ty Guo
pronounced tiger

Solid Snake
Garter
Garter
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 6:02 pm
Location: Exton is where it's at

Post by Solid Snake » Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:19 pm

Well it's really up in the air, I'd like to know where you stand on the issue
Poor Johnny Sasaki.
!
-Solid Snake

User avatar
biostudent84
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 6:00 am
Location: Farmville, VA
Contact:

Post by biostudent84 » Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm

Directing everyone's attention to a thread already started on this subject:

viewtopic.php?t=14

thanks...

TRUE altruism is a negative effect for individuals and populations, as it increases the chances for the genes best adapted for survival to die due to an act of altruism.

In nature, true altruism does not exist. In humans...well...cynics will say that it does not exist here either.

User avatar
Inuyasha
Coral
Coral
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:15 pm
Location: NEW YORK
Contact:

Really

Post by Inuyasha » Thu Dec 23, 2004 11:08 pm

If altruism is so negative then does that put an alutristic creature at a disadvantage. And who do you think is the most altruistic human being in history?
Ty Guo
pronounced tiger

User avatar
biostudent84
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 6:00 am
Location: Farmville, VA
Contact:

Re: Really

Post by biostudent84 » Fri Dec 24, 2004 3:00 am

Inuyasha wrote:If altruism is so negative then does that put an alutristic creature at a disadvantage.


That's the idea, yes.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests