QUANTITY OF DNA.........

Genetics as it applies to evolution, molecular biology, and medical aspects.

Moderator: BioTeam

muffy
Garter
Garter
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:57 pm

QUANTITY OF DNA.........

Post by muffy » Thu Jul 21, 2005 6:04 pm

hi!!

do the birds have less DNA than the mammals ??

tks!!!

User avatar
MrMistery
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
Posts: 6832
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Romania(small and unimportant country)
Contact:

Post by MrMistery » Thu Jul 21, 2005 6:49 pm

Lol... How would you define less or more DNA? By the number of base pairs?
It really depends on the bird and the mamal you are comparing
"As a biologist, I firmly believe that when you're dead, you're dead. Except for what you live behind in history. That's the only afterlife" - J. Craig Venter

muffy
Garter
Garter
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:57 pm

Post by muffy » Thu Jul 21, 2005 8:02 pm

it was a T/F question of my exam..... :roll:

User avatar
MrMistery
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
Posts: 6832
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Romania(small and unimportant country)
Contact:

Post by MrMistery » Thu Jul 21, 2005 8:26 pm

False
"As a biologist, I firmly believe that when you're dead, you're dead. Except for what you live behind in history. That's the only afterlife" - J. Craig Venter

User avatar
victor
King Cobra
King Cobra
Posts: 2668
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 12:01 pm
Location: Yogyakarta, Indonesia..
Contact:

Post by victor » Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:02 pm

Ok..this is a new lesson that I got...the more complex of the organism's structure, the more DNA kbp that they got.
Just compare between virus and E.coli in the DNA base pairs where virus has 180-360 kbp and E.coli has 4636 kbp. :lol:
PS: kbp = kilobase pavis (we count DNA in x1000)
Q: Why are chemists great for solving problems?
A: They have all the solutions.

User avatar
Chris4
Coral
Coral
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 4:56 pm
Location: UK

Post by Chris4 » Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:55 pm

@victor - Like everything in science it is often not that simple. One comparison is never enough. Its like doing an experiment once.

Amoeba has 670,000,000,000 base pairs. thats 670 billion. Humans have 3 billion.
http://www.genomenewsnetwork.org/articl ... omes.shtml

As explained here http://www.abc.net.au/science/slab/geno ... ndings.htm. Its not how big it is, its how you use it (Where have i heard that before :lol: )

A bird does only have about 1 billion bps so it does have less than us.
It's always funny until someone gets hurt. Then it's just hilarious.

User avatar
MrMistery
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
Posts: 6832
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Romania(small and unimportant country)
Contact:

Post by MrMistery » Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:44 pm

So are you guys saying this should be labeled true?
It seems to me that it depends on what bird and what mamal you are comparing....
"As a biologist, I firmly believe that when you're dead, you're dead. Except for what you live behind in history. That's the only afterlife" - J. Craig Venter

User avatar
Chris4
Coral
Coral
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 4:56 pm
Location: UK

Post by Chris4 » Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm

where have you read that birds have more dna than mammals? I think you have to compare number of base pairs aswell as number of genes.
Also which mammal? there are many :?
It's always funny until someone gets hurt. Then it's just hilarious.

User avatar
MrMistery
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
Posts: 6832
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Romania(small and unimportant country)
Contact:

Post by MrMistery » Fri Jul 22, 2005 9:43 pm

That's what i am saying...
There is no way to tell absolutely..
Some birds have more DNA than some mamals and other birds have less DNA than other mamals
"As a biologist, I firmly believe that when you're dead, you're dead. Except for what you live behind in history. That's the only afterlife" - J. Craig Venter

User avatar
Chris4
Coral
Coral
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 4:56 pm
Location: UK

Post by Chris4 » Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:17 pm

And therefore shouldn't have been asked as an exam question. :twisted:
It's always funny until someone gets hurt. Then it's just hilarious.

User avatar
victor
King Cobra
King Cobra
Posts: 2668
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 12:01 pm
Location: Yogyakarta, Indonesia..
Contact:

Post by victor » Sat Jul 23, 2005 12:11 pm

Just take the general one between majority and minority...but, after reading your statements, I agree that it shouldn't be an exam question..
Q: Why are chemists great for solving problems?
A: They have all the solutions.

User avatar
MrMistery
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
Posts: 6832
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Romania(small and unimportant country)
Contact:

Post by MrMistery » Sat Jul 23, 2005 5:29 pm

You shouldn't take the general example since the DNA size is not known for every mammal and bird. What you should do is consider cause and effect. I think this was more of an evolution question than a genetics one. The professor wanted to know if you understand evolution. The wrong answer is "Mammals are more evolved, so i say true". In my opinion, it is Ok as an exam question
"As a biologist, I firmly believe that when you're dead, you're dead. Except for what you live behind in history. That's the only afterlife" - J. Craig Venter

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests