Sorry, this is not epistasis, my bad

Why are imprints(in terms of x inactivation or other imprints) removed in inner cell mass and then ; again inactivated in late blastocyt? [then also PGC's imprints are removed again, somatic's are maintained i know, but it did not make sense. Something is missing or wrong)

claudepa wrote:There are no easy questions. I believe that there is an association between the two proteins synthetized by both alleles. In the association the dominant protein inhibits the function of the recessive protein.

Buti this event is epistasis. Physical repressed mechanism

What is the recessiveness? I think that recessivenes is not expressing protein is not true explaining. Actually, Recessiveness is about phenotype. There is two or more allele in locus. Dominant allele provide dominant phenotype, recessive allele provide recessive, masket phenotype. Recessive allele ...