Latitudinal and longitudinal barriers in global biogeography


Latitudinal and longitudinal barriers in global biogeography

S cedilerban Proche*

Centre for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa

* [email protected]

Keywords: bats; biogeography; Gondwanaland; gymnosperms


Due to changes in climate and continental arrangement, plant and animal assemblages faced different dispersal barriers at different moments in Earth's history. It is generally accepted that groups which diversified during times of Gondwanan-Laurasian separation show different distribution patterns from those of more recent origin. Here I present principal component-derived maps for two globally distributed groups, with ca 1000 species each. Gymnosperm assemblages perfectly illustrate the existence of southern and northern components, corresponding to the Gondwanan and Laurasian temperate floras at the time when angiosperms started becoming dominant in the tropics, thus imposing a latitudinal barrier. Bat (chiropteran) assemblages indicate that the major biogeographical barrier in their Cenozoic dispersal was the longitudinal separation between the Old and New World.

Biology Letters Volume 2, Number 1 / 22 March 2006 pp 69–72.



1. Introduction

Earth's biogeographical regions were traditionally defined on the basis of having distinctive faunas and floras, and their number and delimitation are confirmed to some extent by modern analytical methods (Smith 1983; Proche 2005). However, few borders between regions correspond to abrupt changes in animal or plant assemblages, and most fall in the middle of broad species replacement gradients (Williams 1996). Real demarcation lines are only evident where sharp barriers exist between two regions. The most obvious example is represented by oceanic basins that prevent frequent dispersal between terrestrial systems, but areas with unfavourable climate, interposed between two regions, can also represent barriers in the dispersal of organisms.

For organisms with good dispersal abilities, the Neogene arrangement of continents allows for free movement within the Old World and within the New World, but generally prevents movement between the two, with the exception of cold-tolerant taxa, which can make use of the intermittent opening of the Bering corridor (Sanmartín et al. 2001). The global positioning of land masses was different during much of the Mesozoic, when most of world's dry land was interconnected, but temperate assemblages in the north and south were separated by a broad, relatively uniform band of warm climate (Anderson et al. 1999; Scotese et al. 1999).

It is broadly accepted that numerous animal and plant groups conserve Gondwanan or Laurasian distribution patterns, and that such elements can lend Gondwanan/Laurasian character to regional faunas and floras (Good 1974; Sequeira & Farrell 2001). Likewise, it is acknowledged that in numerous 'modern' groups the most striking difference is that between the Old and New World assemblages (Cristoffer & Peres 2003). However, there has been no attempt to quantify in a spatially explicit manner variation in assemblage composition in cosmopolitan groups of different ages (the widespread, but not cosmopolitan genus Bombus being the closest call; Williams 1996). Here I show that, in bats and gymnosperms, the signal from past and present biogeographical barriers is strong enough to be analytically illustrated.

2. Material and methods

The distributions of two large (ca 1000 species each), cosmopolitan taxa (bats, as an example of a modern, Cenozoic group, and gymnosperms, as an ancient, Mesozoic group) were used to illustrate global patterns of variation in generic assemblage composition. In the case of gymnosperms, the Gnetales were omitted, as some recent phylogenies place them as sister taxon to the angiosperms (and, under this hypothesis, their inclusion would have made gymnosperms paraphyletic; see Schmidt & Schneider-Poetsch 2002). While gymnosperm phylogeny is not definitively agreed on (Hill 2005), the inclusion of Gnetales (or the exclusion of Ginkgoales and Cycadales, included here) would not seriously alter the observed patterns, which are almost entirely due to conifer (Pinales) distributions. The distribution of each species was digitized at the 15° scale, based on comprehensive treatments (Corbett & Hill 1991; Farjon 2001; Jones 2002 and references therein). Fifteen degree squares make a rough cell size, but sufficient to illustrate patterns at a continental scale (for a discussion on the advantages and limitations of this cell size see Proche 2005). To minimize errors resulting from the slightly unequal cell area, only cells between 60°N and 45°S with at least five species were considered in either analysis. (There are no bat or gymnosperm species endemic at higher latitudes.) Principal component analyses (PCAs) were conducted on the presence/absence of genera for either group (STATISTICA 6.1, copyright StatSoft, Inc. 1984-2003). Each factor (component) identified in the analyses thus corresponded to an assemblage of taxa of a certain geographical affinity, i.e. richly represented in a particular set of regions (cf. Barbujani 2000). The purpose of the study being to identify the single most important global-scale barrier in either group of organisms, only the first two factors derived from each analysis (cumulatively accounting for ca 50% of the variation in either group) were retained. The value of each factor was quantified as colour intensity (cyan and yellow, respectively; cf. Brewer 1994; Andrienko et al. 2003). The hues resulting from the combination of colour intensity on the two axes were used to map assemblage variation globally, cells shown in more similar colours thus having more similar bat/gymnosperm assemblages.

3. Results

The two groups considered here showed contrasting patterns in global assemblage variation. In bats, the first factor (explaining 32.56% of the variation) ranged from -0.8 in the temperate regions of the Old World to 0.2 in the tropical New World (the most species-rich region globally). The second factor (explaining 14.56% of the variation) had values of -0.4 (in tropical Southeast Asia, with the most species and genus-rich fauna in the Old World) to 0.7 in the tropical New World. Therefore, globally, the clearest distinction was that between the tropical regions of the New and Old worlds. In the south, the temperate regions were entirely separated, but there was a smooth transition between the northern temperate regions of America and Eurasia (where several bat genera are shared; figure 1a,b).

In gymnosperms, the first two factors (explaining 37.63 and 12.83% of the variation, respectively) corresponded to the northern (factor 1) and southern (factor 2) floras. There were clear clusters of cells at high values on either axis, with a series of transitional cells corresponding to Central America and Southeast Asia ranging between them (figure 1c,d).

4. Discussion

The cells with high score on the principal component axes largely correspond to the areas with the richest and regionally most representative bat and gymnosperm assemblages (see Findley 1993; Contreras-Medina & Vega 2002), confirming that the first two factors do indeed capture the major global patterns in assemblage variation.

How do the patterns mapped here fit in with currently accepted phylogeographic scenarios? From the limited bat fossil record, it appears that extant lineages diverged soon after the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, and diversified mostly in the northern landmasses, where the most plesiomorphic forms and/or the oldest fossils are found (as is the case with Pteropodidae, Rhinolophoidea, Emballonuroidea, Vespertilionoidea). One lineage (Noctilionoidea), however, diversified in the Southern Hemisphere and its three families are currently endemic to New Zealand, Madagascar and tropical America, respectively (Teeling et al. 2005). As the distance between the southern continents increased, these became isolated from one another; and more recent imports from the north found themselves equally isolated from one another, with only one clear case of Atlantic crossing (Emballonuridae; Teeling et al. 2005). With a continuous warm climate belt from Africa to Asia and Australia, tropical bat assemblages in the Old World stayed fairly homogeneous. They were, however, separated from the New World by the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. On the other hand, cold-adapted lineages (Vespertilionidae, Molossidae) found it relatively easy to cross the narrower barriers between North America and Eurasia. This scenario is perfectly reflected in the highly dissimilar bat assemblages in the southern continents and in the tropics, with a gradual transition from the Old to the New World in the northern temperate band.

In the case of gymnosperms, conifers and cycads need to be discussed separately. The major extant conifer lineages are of Jurassic age (Anderson et al. 1999). At that time, some families, like the Araucariaceae, had a broad distribution (Sequeira & Farrell 2001). During the Cretaceous, recently diversified angiosperms largely out-competed slow-growing conifers from the tropical belt (Bond 1989), and different sets of taxa survived in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres (or, if the same taxa survived, they evolved further in complete isolation, resulting in different present-day genera, as may be the case in Cupressaceae and Taxaceae; see Hill & Brodribb 1999). Cooler climates during the Cenozoic allowed both northern and southern lineages to expand and diversify (LePage 2003; Quinn & Price 2003), and even to re-colonize to the tropical belt, where northern and southern lineages co-occur to a limited extent (in Central America, Southeast Asia, East Africa; see figure 1d). Therefore, it can be said that conifer assemblages are in the process of breaking the latitudinal barrier represented by tropical angiosperm forests--mainly, but not only, along longitudinal mountain ranges. However, figure 1d shows that the relictual patterns separating northern and southern assemblages are largely conserved, and the recent tropical intermixing is extremely limited.

Cycads and Ginkgo were included in the dataset, but their limited and fragmented distribution did not grant them an effect on the first two factors separated by the analysis. In cycads, a distinction between northern and southern taxa is not as clear (see Jones 2002). Owing to their mainly tropical modern distribution and long independent evolution in the New and Old Worlds, global cycad assemblages, when considered alone, show a pattern more similar to that observed in bats (data not presented), and given the potential paraphyly of the gymnosperms, this can be viewed as a third, independent analysis. However, the differences between Australia and Africa are much greater here (only one common genus: Cycas), making it more meaningful to talk of three, rather than two 'worlds', with three longitudinal barriers, represented by three oceans.

It can be argued that bats and gymnosperms represent ideal groups to show such contrasting hemispherical patterns, and that in most other groups global-scale barriers will not be nearly as clear. Indeed, most taxa of comparable diversity are likely to be either geographically restricted (e.g. completely absent from temperate regions, Australia or the New World) or at least imbalanced at higher taxonomic levels (Proche 2005). Looking at the single most important barrier globally would be insufficient in such cases, and more than two PCA-derived factors would be needed to fully visualize variations in global assemblage composition.

Principal component analysis used in combination with colour cartography, as exemplified here, represents an attractive way of illustrating geographical barriers and gradients. This method and other spatially explicit techniques, such as neighbourhood turnover indices (Williams et al. 1999) or Monmonier's algorithm (Manni et al. 2004), can complement phylogeographic reconstruction by providing a powerful visualization tool.


Comments from three anonymous referees greatly helped improve the manuscript.


Anderson, J.M., Anderson, H.M., Archangelsky, S., Bamford, M., Chandra, S., Dettmann, M., Hill, R., McLoughlin, S. & Rosler, O. 1999 Patterns of Gondwana plant colonisation and diversification. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 28, 145-167

Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N. & Gitis, V. 2003 Interactive maps for visual exploration of grid and vector geodata. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 57, 380-389

Barbujani, G. 2000 Geographic patterns: how to identify them and why. Hum. Biol. 72, 133-153.

Bond, W.J. 1989 The tortoise and the hare: ecology of angiosperm dominance and gymnosperm persistence. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 36, 227-249.

Brewer, C.A. 1994 Color use guidelines for mapping and visualisation. Visualisation in modern cartography (eds. MacEachren, A.M. & Taylor, D.R.F.), pp. 123-147, Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Contreras-Medina, R. & Vega, I.L. 2002 On the distribution of gymnosperm genera, their areas of endemism and cladistic biogeography. Aust. Syst. Bot. 15, 193-203

Corbett, G.B. & Hill, J.E. 1991 A world list of mammalian species. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cristoffer, C. & Peres, C.A. 2003 Elephants versus butterflies: the ecological role of large herbivores in the evolutionary history of two tropical worlds. J. Biogeogr. 30, 1357-1380

Farjon, A. 2001 World checklist and bibliography of conifers. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

Findley, J. 1993 Bats: a community perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Good, R. 1974 The geography of the flowering plants. New York: Longman.

Hill, K. 2005 Diversity and evolution of gymnosperms. Plant diversity and evolution: genotypic and phenotypic variation in higher plants (ed. Henry, R.J.), pp. 25-44, Wallingford: CAB International.

Hill, R.S. & Brodribb, T.J. 1999 Southern conifers in time and space. Aust. J. Bot. 47, 639-696.

Jones, D.L. 2002 Cycads of the world: ancient plants in today's landscape. Sydney: Reed New Holland.

LePage, B.A. 2003 The evolution, biogeography and paleoecology of the Pinaceae based on fossil and extant representatives. Proc. Fourth Int. Conifer Conf.. (ed. Mill, R.R.), pp. 29-52, Leuven: International Society for Horticultural Science.

Manni, F., Guerard, E. & Heyer, E. 2004 Geographic patterns of (genetic, morphologic, linguistic) variation: how barriers can be detected by using Monmonier's algorithm. Hum. Biol. 76, 173-190.

Proche, S cedil. 2005 The world's biogeographical regions: cluster analyses based on bat distributions. J. Biogeogr. 32, 607-614

Quinn, J.C. & Price, R.A. 2003 Phylogeny of the southern hemisphere conifers. Proc. Fourth Int. Conifer Conf.. (ed. Mill, R.R.), pp. 129-136, Leuven: International Society for Horticultural Science.

Sanmartín, I., Enghoff, H. & Ronquist, F. 2001 Patterns of animal dispersal, vicariance and diversification in the Holarctic. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 73, 345-390

Schmidt, M. & Schneider-Poetsch, H.A.W. 2002 The evolution of gymnosperms redrawn by phytochrome genes: the gnetatae appear at the base of the gymnosperms. J. Mol. Evol. 54, 715-724

Scotese, C.R., Boucot, A.J. & McKerrow, W.S. 1999 Gondwanan palaeogeography and palaeoclimatology. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 28, 99-114

Sequeira, A.S. & Farrell, B.D. 2001 Evolutionary origins of Gondwanan interactions: how old are Araucaria beetle herbivores?. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 74, 459-474

Smith, C.H. 1983 A system of world mammal faunal regions. I. Logical and statistical derivation of the regions. J. Biogeogr. 10, 455-466.

Teeling, E.C., Springer, M.S., Madsen, O., Bates, P., O'Brien, S.J. & Murphy, W.J. 2005 A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record. Science 307, 580-584

Williams, P.H. 1996 Mapping variations in the strength and breadth of biogeographic transition zones using species turnover. Proc. R. Soc. B 263, 579-588.

Williams, P.H., de Klerk, H.M. & Crowe, T.M. 1999 Interpreting biogeographical boundaries among Afrotropical birds: spatial patterns in richness gradients and species replacement. J. Biogeogr. 26, 459-474



Figure 1
Principal component analyses (a, c) and maps showing global variation in assemblage composition (b, d) for bats (a, b) and gymnosperms (c, d). Only 15times15° cells with more than five species in either group were included in the analyses.