Tue

What else is this? Re: question for evolutionary biologist. Postby scottie » Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:23 pm Jackbean It is Venter's claim that his team “created a new species without any biological precursor.” It was he that referred to this as a “proof of concept”

See entire post

... when I reported on the evidence of no precursor to the ribosome here http://www.biology-online.org/biology-forum/about14351-204.html by scottie » Tue Sep 13, 2011 10:05 pm This is something being taken out of context is it? Or when I reported on the subject of cave animals here http://www.biology-online.org/biology-forum/about14351-384.html ...

See entire post

... design could be falsified. However I have done precisely that, and it is about where you entered into this discussion. Remember! scottie » Tue Jun 21, 2011 10:20 pm To be regarded as science then it must be falsifiable. So once again, is this understanding falsifiable? I answer Yes, it ...

See entire post

... page 7 I previously set out my thoughts is the post on page 13 http://www.biology-online.org/biology-forum/about14351-144.html by scottie » Tue Jun 21, 2011 10:20 pm Lets start with my view. We all see functional design in the cell and no one seriously argues with that. The question is how ...

See entire post

... but that is another story. 2) Design theory is falsifiable. In a previous post I pointed to one way in which it would be falsifiable. scottie » Tue Jun 21, 2011 10:20 pm http://www.biology-online.org/biology-forum/about14351-144.html starting at this statement. Is my understanding of Functional ...

See entire post