
|
|
Dictionary » S » Succession SuccessionDefinition noun, plural: successions 1. (general) (a.) The act of following in order or sequence. (b.) A following of things, events, people, or ranks after another in sequence of time, as in a succession of disasters.
The word succession was first used by the French naturalist Adolphe Dureau de la Malle to refer to the vegetation development after forest clear-felling. Ecological succession has an essential role in changing the composition or structure of a community. For instance, a new community of forest trees introduces shade to its ecosystem, or a previous community of vegetation that changed the fertility of the soil. Succession may arise from the formation of new, unoccupied habitat (e.g. a lava flow or a severe landslide). This kind of succession in which the sequential development of plant or animal communities in an area where no soil initially exists is called primary succession. Succession may also be initiated by a disturbance of an existing community (e.g. fire, severe windthrow, logging). This kind of succession where communities develop in areas where soil already exists is called secondary succession.
![]()
Please contribute to this project, if you have more information about this term feel free to edit this page ![]()
Results from our forumRe: mutations and dependencies... it was evidence for evolution, just that it didn't falsify the theory. However, you did make a good point. There are points at which the supposed succession becomes difficult to track, which makes the theory more difficult to falsify. Genetics/the very existence of DNA proves it never happened, ...
See entire post
Re: mutations and dependencies... of university biology teachers who KNOWINGLY indoctrinate them/evolutionary biology propaganda. That ncbi article doesn't state that there is no succession. You've only shown that, if there are successions at these major transitions, those successions are difficult to track. I said "(more ...
See entire post
Re: mutations and dependencies... No intermediate "grades" or intermediate forms between different types are detectable. That ncbi article doesn't state that there is no succession. You've only shown that, if there are successions at these major transitions, those successions are difficult to track. I said "(more ...
See entire post
Re: mutations and dependencies the fossil record should reveal a succession. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17708768 In each of these pivotal nexuses in life's history, the principal "types" seem to appear rapidly and fully equipped with the signature features ...
See entire post
Re:... untestable, but the theory of evolution gets much more specific than that. According to the theory of evolution, the fossil record should reveal a succession. A fossil that violates this would falsify the theory. The theory of evolution also now rests on genetic evidence. Organsisms that should ...
See entire post
This page was last modified 09:23, 17 June 2008. This page has been accessed 97,397 times. |
© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved.
Register | Login
| About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy