Rigor

... ad hominem - I repeated the science of the matter and offered no opinion and didn't even identify ID. Again, try to address honesty with more rigor in your future posts.

See entire post

... on for way too long, so I'll just address this briefly. For one thing, the number of citations in the paper is irrelevant to its scientific rigor and/or significance. The paper describing the discovery of the double helix, for instance, cites only four sources. So I'm not sure why you think ...

See entire post

... to a private message of Jesus, mankind exists only since about 6.000 years ago. So, any dating before the flood is not credible, despite the rigor of the scientific methods. Remember that such datings are logical calculus, and as such, they may be... false... What really happened: ancient ...

See entire post

... to a private message of Jesus, mankind exists only since about 6.000 years ago. So, any dating before the flood is not credible, despite the rigor of the scientific methods. Remember that such datings are logical calculus, and as such, they may be... false... What really happened: ancient ...

See entire post

... to a private message of Jesus, mankind exists only since about 6.000 years ago. So, any dating before the flood is not credible, despite the rigor of the scientific methods. Remember that such datings are logical calculus, and as such, they may be... false... What really happened: ancient ...

See entire post