Morals

... are other possible explanations than the one you leaped to) The original point was that regardless of the source of our beliefs, convictions, morals, etc; they exist. To say that a scientific explanation of our origin negates our morality is not a valid conclusion.

See entire post

... capacity to differentiate right and wrong - to be fair and just? The FACT is that humans have an individual capacity to develop philosophies and morals - regardless of where that capacity came from. Scientific evidence points to the probability that this capacity originated via evolution. If ...

See entire post

... that gene insertion will become an available technology. Lots of people will claim this is somehow immoral. I disagree. I think history shows that morals change, and whatever is of benefit gets accepted. Artificial insemination, only a few decades back, was considered somehow immoral. Today, lots ...

See entire post

... to imagine that a magical/non physical entity has always existed. I have no problem with most religions, in fact most religions have very good morals, i only have problems with those religions which seek to 'enlighten' other religions as to the fact that theirs is the 'real' one. I will go ...

See entire post

... think I got the question right .. I once read this book ,Human senses roots theory , the author was trying to explain the evolutionary concepts of morals , ethics under the light of Atom's four forces , so the four forces are complex in a way along the life evolutionary line where it gives it's ...

See entire post