Men

... 150 years later Darwins poison legacy lives on. They started the science journal nature, every thing you ever see on TV (Documentaries (Attenbourough is an evolutionist) on nature) , national geographic magazines, straw men debates (Dawkins vs some catholic n00b) 'Science ...

See entire post

Because women are in general "programmed" to have rather few offspring with favourable men (huge one egg vs. many tiny sperms etc.) So then it all comes down to a battle between the gametes? That is, it is only evolutionary ...

See entire post

Because women are in general "programmed" to have rather few offspring with favourable men (huge one egg vs. many tiny sperms etc.)

See entire post

I've thought about this for a while. Why is it that penis-in-vagina intercourse is pleasurable for men, but not women? (In general, women do not orgasm from vaginal stimulation, and some don't even feel any pleasure from it at all.) I would have thought that it would make ...

See entire post

Ok. NDT is a universal acid on all science. The goal is to indoctrinate http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teleology Statements which imply that nature has goals, for example where a species is said to do something "in order to" achieve survival, appear teleological, and therefore ...

See entire post