Dictionary » L » Lamarckism

Lamarckism

Definition

noun

The theory suggesting that traits or characteristics of an organism are produced and inherited by direct influence of the physical environment, by effort, or by use or disuse of body parts.


Supplement

According to this theory, individuals lose characteristics they do not require (or use) and develop characteristics that are useful. These characteristics or traits are caused by changes or mutations in the organism that are directed towards some objective so the organism would become better adapted to a particular situation or to its environment, and the traits acquired or learned during its lifetime can be passed on to its offspring which would also be possessing these traits.

However, this theory is no longer widely accepted like before. For instance, according to this theory, the giraffes evolve into having long necks because of their stretching to reach for the leaves on tall trees, and this trait had been passed on to its offspring. But other leaf-eating animals with short necks would not need a long neck to survive. A sheep does not need longer neck as it can eat leaves from grass. This indicates the giraffe's neck is long not because of the result of direct mutation, nor because it is a requisite for survival, but because it is caused by random mutation.


Word origin: named after the French biologist Jean-Baptiste Lamarck.
Synonym: Lamarckian theory.
See also: direct mutation, soft inheritance.


Please contribute to this project, if you have more information about this term feel free to edit this page



Results from our forum


What is the proof...

One cannot say so, really. Lamarckism was a theory that tried to explain how giraffes got their long necks (by inheriting achieved traits), but it turned out Lamarck got his idea wrong. However, Jean-Baptiste might find some comfort from ...

See entire post
by biohazard
Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:43 pm
 
Forum: Evolution
Topic: What is the proof...
Replies: 5
Views: 856

Re: Microevolution is a fairytale

... what exactly would you take?...ToE is a theory that says only populations evolve...so if I showed you an example of individuals evolving (lamarckism) would that refute your theory? Something tells me it wouldn't. The fact is, nothing can or will refute ToE because ToE is a belief system, ...

See entire post
by supersport
Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:41 am
 
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Microevolution is a fairytale
Replies: 23
Views: 3268

Misconceptions about evolution

... idea is not appropriate. But can natural selection - if it can affect our body - be applied like this? I think NOT. this misconception is like the Lamarckism;the theory of use and disuse: If we use our arms repeatedly, then our arms will become longer and longer. We know this idea is not right. ...

See entire post
by Tae Jun, Yoon
Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:42 pm
 
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Misconceptions about evolution
Replies: 4
Views: 1516

Lamarckism and the Honeyguide

i understand lamarckism (i think thats how its spelled :S) but what is the honeyguide?

See entire post
by Mr Joe
Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:30 pm
 
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Lamarckism and the Honeyguide
Replies: 14
Views: 3384

Why I think Neo-darwinism is dead

... tubes". I think you need to learn the fundamentals of genetics before you can make such a direct claim. Of course there are some examples of lamarckism "working" but these are few and far between, and are by no means universal. There are far too many critisisms of scientific theory ...

See entire post
by rob3
Thu Nov 23, 2006 11:49 am
 
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Why I think Neo-darwinism is dead
Replies: 26
Views: 6729
View all matching forum results

This page was last modified 08:26, 2 July 2008. This page has been accessed 834 times. 
What links here | Related changes | Permanent link