Euphotic zone

NATURAL SELECTION GENERATES NEW SPECIES!! (Direct counter to Dean's argument) IT DOES NOT GENERATE NEW GENES the logic is very simple new species have new genes/traits if NS does not generate new genes then NS cant generate new species it is logically and definitionaly impossible for NS to generate...

See entire post

MolecularBioFTW says http://www.biology-online.org/biology-forum/about15762-192.html NS is not responsible for new genes now a new species has new genes/traits thus if natural selection is not responsible for new genes then it cannot be responsible for the origin/generation of species as colin lesli...

See entire post

When new genes emerge in the population (read my previous posts about how this is possible, you retard), NS does not create new genes it only passes them on It is the process by which [b]heritable[b] traits that increase an organism’s chances of survival and reproduction are favoured than less bene...

See entire post

When new genes emerge in the population (read my previous posts about how this is possible, you retard), NS does not create new genes it only passes them on It is the process by which [b]heritable[b] traits that increase an organism’s chances of survival and reproduction are favoured than less bene...

See entire post

Wow you again reiterate the same point about the site's definition of natural selection. My original point is that not only do expressed genes get passed on but also "in-progress" genes which aren't expressed yet. but note these genes are already present NS did not create the genes it onl...

See entire post