Darwinism

First I want to start off by reminding you that evolution and Darwinism are two different things, even though Darwinism is based off of evolving. It seemed to me when I was reading your replies, that you may not remember that. I also need to remind you, ...

See entire post

... There is also a more in depth debate about on all this on another forum: http://scienceforums.com/topic/26322-had-evolution-moved-beyond-neo-darwinism/

See entire post

2. What is the EVIDENCE proving [Neo-Darwinian] Evolution to be correct that you are aware of? What exactly isn't supported by the evidence? Neo-Darwinism encompasses multiple claims, and many people here could spend a long time explaining the evidence for each claim. I'll try to make a good list ...

See entire post

... works - just because a detail of one system turns out to be untrue, the whole system isn't invalidated. Welcome to biology... And since neo-darwinism pulled natural selection and genetics together, I don't see how it can be anything other than a synthesis. Sorry but you are wrong. Science ...

See entire post

... was a period of 40 years or more where scientists were looking for alternatives to replace natural selection they call this perioud the eclipse of Darwinism. So which alternative theories are there? Theres neo-Lamarckism the notion that aquired traits can be inherited, saltation (evolution by jumps ...

See entire post