Simpson's Diversity Index and Single Individuals

Discussion of the distribution and abundance of living organisms and how these properties are affected by interactions between the organisms and their environment

Moderators: honeev, Leonid, amiradm, BioTeam

Post Reply
ac2012
Garter
Garter
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2012 11:06 am

Simpson's Diversity Index and Single Individuals

Post by ac2012 » Wed Sep 05, 2012 12:04 pm

Hello,

I'm trying to calculate the Simpson's Diversity Index (D), which I then convert to the reciprocal (1-D). I'm using the method described in "Measuring Biological Diversity" by Anne Magurran.

The problem is that many of my samples have only one individual of each species present in them.
I've noticed that when this is the case, no matter how many species are present 1-D = 1, which seems to suggest that diversity is at the maximum level possible.

In the spreadsheet I've put a link to below I've calculated an example containing 7 species and an example containing just 2 species.

It seems strange that the resulting 1-D should be the same for both of these.

I was wondering whether I should accept this as correct, and record 1-D as 1 for both of these cases, regardless of how strange it seems.

If anyone could let me know what is normally done in this situation I'd be very grateful.

Thank you very much.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/uivowprjfym1gjz/simpsons.png

ac2012
Garter
Garter
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2012 11:06 am

Post by ac2012 » Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:14 pm

Sorry, that should have been the "complement" not the reciprocal. (1-D)

animartco
Coral
Coral
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:56 pm

Post by animartco » Tue Nov 19, 2013 1:39 pm

Hi ac2012. When calculating statistics the larger the sample the greater the accuracy. A sample of one is no use whatever. Even 5 is too small for any viable calculation.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests