God vs Evolution

[tianlai]

Philosophers could think that white horse is not a horse, but biologist couldn't think so.

[mcar]

Reality is the present. But man isn't satisfied with the evidences from the past. What we are ought do today is the one that will shape our destiny. Yes, we have the freedom to go and choose the idea and way of living. But we have to remember that we can do nothing anymore about the past. For we were not there when it had all begun.

[Jellybeans]

I believe that God created everything, and that everything evolved and shaped into what is suitable and best for it.

_________________________________________________________________________________

The only reason of our existence is to rule over what God has created and to improve our lives and even our faith as well.

[Tim12]

Charles, what you were wrongly attributing to be Christ's words to this followers, was a parable he was telling his disciples about a hard master. Sheesh!

[Tim12]

My post seems to have been misplaced.
As I tried again, it was again misplaced to a completely different subject.

[JackBean]

to different subject or different page?

[hydr]

I Don't know that god doesn't exist, just being a science major I see all the evidence that points otherwise. maybe aliens created"GOD" who knows.

[thoffnagle]

I believe God created the universe and everything in it. And that evolution is an incorrect 'THEORY' made by the human race to neglect God. I want your argument about why you believe that human existence is a freak accident or if we were created for a purpose.

I didn't read through the thread but I hope that someone asked the following questions:

1 - What evidence do you have to support the existence of your god?

If you have no evidence for your god, then you have to go with another hypothesis. Darwin's Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection explains very well how life evolved, once it had already began. There are several hypotheses to explain how life began - admittedly, they all have flaws but they all follow the laws of physics and are, therefore, explainable. In fact, the entire process from Big Bang to humans (why are we always thought of as the epitome of life? It's a totally unsupportable view.) is explainable by the laws of physics. So,

2 - Why do you reject these explainable hypotheses?

Lastly, please learn the scientific definition for the word "theory"! If you're going to use it in a scientific context, you should know how to do so. Even the fundiots at Answers in Genesis know how to use it. If you are behind even AiG, then you really should catch up to the 20th, if not the 21st century!