Login

|
|
Which is the correct optionModerator: BioTeam
9 posts • Page 1 of 1
Which is the correct optionAtp molecules combine with carrier molecules and allow passage of substances
a) along concentratio gradient b) against concentration gradient c) both a and b I think it should be b but the book says it should be c Please specify which option is correct
Hmmm. I know ATP is required to move a substance against the concentration gradient. I know it isn't necessary for the movement of substances down the concentration gradient. My question is "What does your book mean by along?" If it means moving a substance from one place to another without bringing it into or pushing it out of the cell, then I guess C could work, but I doubt that is what it means. I haven't learned anything about movement "along" a concentration gradient in Cell Biology or Micro. Maybe you ought to ask the professor.
probably just means with the gradient rather than against it.
What did the parasitic Candiru fish say when it finally found a host? - - "Urethra!!"
to move something along a concentration gradient means to move it down its concentration gradient(from high concentration to low concentration).
PS: no idea why the book says it should be c... "As a biologist, I firmly believe that when you're dead, you're dead. Except for what you live behind in history. That's the only afterlife" - J. Craig Venter
hmm...about the utilization of ATP to move substrates along the conc gradient, I think it's because some substrates must be activated in order to go forward the membrane gate protein. And one of the activation process is phosphorylation of the substrates/protein.
I think that the example is the maltose transporter in E. coli which is a periplasmic-binding-protein transport system. When maltose move through the outer LPS membrane into the periplasmic space, it's bound with the periplasmic protein. Then, if the cell want the maltose to be further transported into the cell, then a transmembrane protein in the cell membrane must be activated in order to bound with this periplasmic glucose-protein and get the glucose transported inside. This activation then requires ATP and is one of the active transport. Any opinion about this? Q: Why are chemists great for solving problems?
A: They have all the solutions.
could be what the guy asking the question had in mind....
"As a biologist, I firmly believe that when you're dead, you're dead. Except for what you live behind in history. That's the only afterlife" - J. Craig Venter
Another example that I could think of is a PTS (phosphotransferase system) which is also utilized mainly in Gram+ bacteria.
In this system, it uses phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) instead of ATP to phosphorylate glucose and get the glucose in through the specific transmembrane gate protein. But it's known that PEP will generate 1 ATP if it's converted into pyruvate. I read this in Brock Biology Of Microorganisms 10th Ed. by Madigan et al (2003). Q: Why are chemists great for solving problems?
A: They have all the solutions.
9 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy