Login

Join for Free!
17210 members


Please help me-Why is Monocots considered superior to Dicots

Plants!

Moderator: BioTeam

Please help me-Why is Monocots considered superior to Dicots

Postby kathywilliams on Wed Nov 07, 2007 4:15 pm

Hi,

I require help on this question, please...

Why is Monocots considered superior to Dicots????. Thanks in advance :)
Kathy
I love the website
http://www.learnerstv.com
kathywilliams
Banned
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 6:55 am

Postby AstusAleator on Sat Nov 10, 2007 8:48 pm

They are?
If we're talking about evolutionary precedence, they evolved before dicots...
However dicots are more dominant, as far as I know.
"Humanity's behavior suggests intelligence is an evolutionary dead end." - Wayne M. Schmidt
User avatar
AstusAleator
King Cobra
King Cobra
 
Posts: 845
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:51 pm
Location: Oregon, USA

Postby Cristgonz on Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:45 pm

mmmh.. why do you say that monocots are superior to dicots?

it just a name to explain the number of cotiledons on the seed :S.
i know that monocots are the angiosperms and dicots are the magnoliopsidaes.
~~Agronomist Engineer, Dekalb Seeds
Anasac, Chile
User avatar
Cristgonz
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 8:59 pm

Postby MrMistery on Sat Nov 17, 2007 9:06 pm

actually angiosperms are divided between magnoliopsida(dicots) and liliopsia(dicots). A more recent clasification divides angiosperms between basal angiosperms, eudicots and monocots.

Now, it is true that monocots are more evolved than dicotes. But you need to understand what "evolved" means. Humans are more evolved than bacteria, but there are still a lot of bacteria around. It's just that humans evolved after bacteria. Same with plants: monocots evolved after dicots.
PS: they are not a way to explain the number of cotyledons of the seed. there are many differences in structure and function between the two.
"I have no intention of stopping anytime soon. I want to understand the universe and answer the big questions, that is what keeps me going" - Stephen Hawking
User avatar
MrMistery
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
 
Posts: 6064
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Romania(small and unimportant country)

Postby Cristgonz on Fri Nov 23, 2007 3:03 am

MrMistery wrote:actually angiosperms are divided between magnoliopsida(dicots) and liliopsia(dicots). A more recent clasification divides angiosperms between basal angiosperms, eudicots and monocots.

Now, it is true that monocots are more evolved than dicotes. But you need to understand what "evolved" means. Humans are more evolved than bacteria, but there are still a lot of bacteria around. It's just that humans evolved after bacteria. Same with plants: monocots evolved after dicots.
PS: they are not a way to explain the number of cotyledons of the seed. there are many differences in structure and function between the two.

yes, but the name is in agreement to the number of cotyledons, mono = 1, di = 2.
XD
~~Agronomist Engineer, Dekalb Seeds
Anasac, Chile
User avatar
Cristgonz
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 8:59 pm

Postby MrMistery on Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:04 pm

True, at the origin. Because they had to be named after something(after that it was decided that it is proper to name things after an organism. hence magnoliopsida and liliopsida). But they cary a muuuuch bigger significance than "just a name to explain the number of cotiledons on the seed".
"I have no intention of stopping anytime soon. I want to understand the universe and answer the big questions, that is what keeps me going" - Stephen Hawking
User avatar
MrMistery
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
 
Posts: 6064
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Romania(small and unimportant country)



Return to Botany Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests