
|
|
Neve signal amplicationModerator: BioTeam
15 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Neve signal amplicationI need a review on nerve signal amplification.
That how impulse travel from 1 end to another? and do its strength remain same or not if same than how as traveling from 1 pt. to other must bear some lose? SomeWHERE someTHING IncreaDIBLE is GOING to HaPPEN
An impulse is a wave of gates opening in the axon membrane, allowing ions that have been pumped into a very uneven outside/inside distribution to flow back VERY quickly (and opening the gates farther along). After the signal passes, the gates close and the pumps reset the membrane potential.
This produces a signal that is generated and regenerated as it travels, which is why it holds its strength. That is, as long as the potential can be set, and some diseases interfere with that. Signal strength varies from nerve to nerve, but not ON the same nerve - stronger signals come from a bunch of signals sent one after the other. What would you be amplifying the signal for?
I am not amplifying signal right now may be after 3 yrs and 10 months.. actually I asked this for raising a question which is based on impedance. I'll ask here very soon just by collecting some material on signal amplification.
Thanks for presentation Dr. Stein and Darby for replying SomeWHERE someTHING IncreaDIBLE is GOING to HaPPEN
If I sum up what u said is that:
signal traveling in nerve decreases its strength but at the same time due to channels it gain its strength back i.e. let suppose two ends of nerve a and b impulse be the strength of 2 and a1 be intermediate points impulse start moving from a and move towards b.. the strength of impulse while traveling from a to a1 decreases some of its strength i.e. decreases from 2 to 1 but due to channels it re-gain its original strength 2 .. similarly while moving from a1 to b it loses its strength and re-gain its original strength and at the end, the strength of signal/impulse remains same as it was at point a Am I right? SomeWHERE someTHING IncreaDIBLE is GOING to HaPPEN
Yes, they are under McGraw-Hill. Another animations I have are from Benjamin Cummings, Pearson, and Garland. Besides available in the net, they are also included in CD, which is attached the book if you purchase it ![]()
Abu Anzar - the strength does sort of reset at the synapses, but it doesn't decrease along the way - think of the signal this way.
Along a wall is a series of light switches, all for the same strength bulbs. Standing at those switches is a person. Each person's job is to - - flip the switch when poked. - after flipping the switch, poke the next person. - after poking the next person, flipping the switch off again. This signal of lights-in-series doesn't weaken with distance, since the strength is local, not propagated. It's always the same strength (unless some outside force affects it), and since the "people" are all identical, it's always moving at the same velocity. It can go faster in some systems, where the number of people and switches at each spot is higher (larger axons), or the people and switches are more efficient (myelinated axons). On another note, I liked the animation link, but it's about a very different type of cell signalling.
Now its clear, to many extend
actually I am working on impedance that signals in nerve amplified but no impedance produced why.. ur answer has resolved this to many extend, I'll think on it further if any hurdle come across again than I'll be here again. Thanks SomeWHERE someTHING IncreaDIBLE is GOING to HaPPEN
ok!
hmmmz can u write the basic difference b//w them except that in wire there is flow of charges and in nerve there is flow of ions, and resistance that is produced by wire and myelin sheath that increases the velocity of impulses SomeWHERE someTHING IncreaDIBLE is GOING to HaPPEN
In axon there is no flow of ions per se. You should read a little on how the signal is going through This should be a good start:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_potential Patrick
Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without any proof. (Ashley Montague)
15 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |

© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy
Science Network - Braintrack.com - University Directory | Chemicool.com - Chemistry | EquationSheet.com - Equations | Logo design by LogoBee