
|
|
erythroblastosis fetalisModerator: BioTeam erythroblastosis fetalisi'll prolly muddle this question up, but its something that i've come across tonight with no specific answer.
If a pregnant woman is Rh-negative and she gets exposed to her baby's Rh-positive blood - she develops antibodies against it, with the next child if the same thing happens her body will attack her child's right? My question is will the same thing happen if the mother is Rh-positive and the baby is Rh-negative? (a friend told me no, because only an Rh negative person can develop antibodies, becoming sensitised to Rh-positive, while Rh-positive people can't produce antibodies against Rh-Neg,because there are no receptors for it) is this right, or is it possible that the fetus's blood attacks the mother's causing inflammation of the placenta or something? thanks D_J
You need to understand that by "contact" we only mean a small amount of blood, not 2 liters
"I have no intention of stopping anytime soon. I want to understand the universe and answer the big questions, that is what keeps me going" - Stephen Hawking
yeah i figure that, but i was just wondering if the reaction is able to occur the other way around aswell...
i was just thinking even if there was a small rupture in the placenta, causing the baby's blood to attack the mother's that would stimulate an immune response from the mother would it not?
The blood of the baby and the blood of the mother NEVER mixes. What do you mean by saying a small rupture? It matters not how strait the gate
How charged with punishment the scroll I am the Master of my fate I am the Captain of my soul.
Ok, so what you need to understand is that the blood of the baby and that of the mothernever mix. It happens(though rarely) that they mix at childbirth. If what you are saying were to happen(but it doesn't) the result would be death of the baby, the mother would be fine
"I have no intention of stopping anytime soon. I want to understand the universe and answer the big questions, that is what keeps me going" - Stephen Hawking
RhWhat I think is the matter of how many blood inside the baby. The diferences between mother's and the baby's blood in quantity maybe one of the factor that nothing happened when Rh+ mother have an Rh- baby
Maybe. But also think that, as I said before, the baby is like an organ of the mother. So the body prefers to kill the organ rather than killing the organism.
It matters not how strait the gate
How charged with punishment the scroll I am the Master of my fate I am the Captain of my soul.
Hum..But, now I get a little doubt bout my statement above..I started to think that cells can reproduce in fast time...so soon or later they will be many also (not as man as mothers but I think it's enough to create problems inside the mother's womb)
Yes but not necessarily. Many babies are born dead
"I have no intention of stopping anytime soon. I want to understand the universe and answer the big questions, that is what keeps me going" - Stephen Hawking
It is necessary. I'm not talking about dead born babies. Those babies die inside the mother, couldn't be recognized and poison the mother's blood.
It matters not how strait the gate
How charged with punishment the scroll I am the Master of my fate I am the Captain of my soul.
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |

© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy
Science Network - Braintrack.com - University Directory | Chemicool.com - Chemistry | EquationSheet.com - Equations | Logo design by LogoBee