Login
Answers to all your Biology Questions
|
|
The Fiber DiseaseModerator: BioTeam
to Canada (sorry, I cant ever remember your username correctly) and to maggie and frank too:
check this out.... Human development VIII http://www.google.com/search?q=Human+De ... f8&oe=utf8
Anyone who is seeking medical attention from a licensed physician should contact Randy Yaskal. Her orginization has compiled a directory of doctors who recognize our disease and are treating Morgellons victims. Randy's newsletter below lists her contact information.
I suppose you conveniently missed this one huh MFC?
.......and like all liars, MFC tucks its tail and runs when confronted with truth.
The Delphi Technique — What Is It?
The Delphi Technique was originally conceived as a way to obtain the opinion of experts without necessarily bringing them together face to face. In recent times, however, it has taken on an all new meaning and purpose. In Educating for the New World Order by B. Eakman, the reader finds reference upon reference for the need to preserve the illusion that there is "…lay, or community, participation (in the decision-making process), while lay citizens were, in fact, being squeezed out." The Delphi Technique is the method being used to squeeze citizens out of the process, effecting a left-wing take over of the schools. A specialized use of this technique was developed for teachers, the "Alinsky Method" (ibid, p.123). The setting or group is, however, immaterial; the point is that people in groups tend to share a certain knowledge base and display certain identifiable characteristics (known as group dynamics). This allows for a special application of a basic technique. The change agent or facilitator goes through the motions of acting as an organizer, getting each person in the target group to elicit expression of their concerns about a program, project, or policy in question. The facilitator listens attentively, forms "task forces," "urges everyone to make lists," and so on. While s/he is doing this, the facilitator learns something about each member of the target group. S/He identifies the "leaders," the "loud mouths," as well as those who frequently turn sides during the argument — the "weak or noncommittal". Suddenly, the amiable facilitator becomes "devil's advocate." S/He dons his professional agitator hat. Using the "divide and conquer" technique, s/he manipulates one group opinion against the other. This is accomplished by manipulating those who are out of step to appear "ridiculous, unknowledgeable, inarticulate, or dogmatic." S/He wants certain members of the group to become angry, thereby forcing tensions to accelerate. The facilitator is well trained in psychological manipulation. S/He is able to predict the reactions of each group member. Individuals in opposition to the policy or program will be shut out of the group. The method works. It is very effective with parents, teachers, school children, and any community group. The "targets" rarely, if ever, know that they are being manipulated. Or, if they suspect this is happening, do not know how to end the process. The desired result is for group polarization, and for the facilitator to become accepted as a member of the group and group process. S/He will then throw the desired idea on the table and ask for opinions during discussion. Very soon his/her associates from the divided group begin to adopt the idea as if it were their own, and pressure the entire group to accept the proposition. This technique is a very unethical method of achieving consensus on a controversial topic in group settings. http://www.learn-usa.com/transformation_process/acf001.htm
The Delphi Technique — How to Disrupt It
Ground rules for disrupting the consensus process (Delphi Technique) — when facilitators want to steer a group in a specific direction. 1) Always Be Charming. Smile, be pleasant, be courteous, moderate your voice so as not to come across as belligerent or aggressive. 2) Stay Focused. If at all possible, write your question down to help you stay focused. Facilitators, when asked questions they don't want to answer, often digress from the issue raised and try to work the conversation around to where they can make the individual asking the question look foolish, feel foolish, appear belligerent or aggressive. The goal is to put the one asking the question on the defensive. Do not fall for this tactic. Always be charming, thus deflecting any insinuation, innuendo, etc, that may be thrown at you in their attempt to put you on the defensive, but bring them back to the question you asked. If they rephrase your question into an accusatory statement (a favorite tactic) simply state, "that is not what I stated, what I asked was… (repeat your question)." Stay focused on your question. 3) Be Persistent. If putting you on the defensive doesn't work, facilitators often resort to long drawn out dissertations on some off-the-wall and usually unrelated, or vaguely related, subject that drags on for several minutes – during which time the crowd or group usually loses focus on the question asked (which is the intent). Let them finish with their dissertation/expose, then nicely, with focus and persistence, state, "but you didn't answer my question. My question was… (repeat your question)." Remember… always be charming, stay focused, and be persistent. Never, under any circumstance, become angry. Anger directed at the facilitator will immediately make the facilitator "the victim." This defeats the purpose which is to make you the victim. The goal of the facilitator is to make those they are facilitating like them, alienating anyone who might pose a threat to the realization of their agenda. [People with fixed belief systems, who know what they believe and stand on what they believe, are obvious threats.] If the participant becomes the victim, the facilitator loses face and favor with the crowd. This is why crowds are broken up into groups of seven or eight, why objections are written on cards, not voiced aloud where they are open to public discussion and public debate. It's called crowd control. It is always good to have someone else, or two or three others who know the Delphi Technique dispersed through the crowd; who, when the facilitator digresses from the question, will stand up and say nicely, "but you didn't answer that lady's/gentleman's question." The facilitator, even if suspecting you are together, certainly will not want to alienate the crowd by making that accusation. Sometimes it only takes one occurrence of this type for the crowd to figure out what's going on, sometimes it takes more than one. If you have an organized group, meet before the meeting to strategize. Everyone should know their part. Meet after the meeting to analyze what went right, what went wrong and why, and what needs to happen the next time around. Never meet during the meeting. One of the favorite tactics of the facilitator, if the meeting is not going the way he/she wants, if he/she is meeting measurable resistance, is to call a recess. During the recess, the facilitator and his/her "spotters" (people who wander the room during the course of the meeting, watching the crowd) watch the crowd to see who congregates where, especially those who have offered measurable resistance. If the "resistors" congregate in one place, a "spotter" will usually gravitate to that group to "join in the conversation" and will report back to the facilitator. When the meeting resumes, the facilitator will steer clear of those who are "resistors." Do not congregate. Hang loose and work the crowd. Move to where the facilitator or "spotters" are, listen to what they have to say, but do not gravitate to where another member of your team is. This strategy also works in a face to face, one on one, meeting with anyone who has been trained in how to use the Delphi Technique. With thanks to Sandy Vanderberg, Peg Luksik and others http://www.learn-usa.com/transformation_process/acf002.htm
Persons who are suffering with this scourge, don't be defeated into doing nothing....just as Randy is getting people calling her, I beieve that if everyone takes the time to call Defense Funds, Large Environmental Groups, espeically ones that despise genetically modified food, e -mail, copy and paste good articles from other blogs if you don't know what to say...leave on blogs...If we just stay here arguing and not attempt to get fair help, we are wasting time. My mom used to say "if he's bigger than you, pick up an equalizer" We have the net, phones, mail, voices, and lots of grocery stores, libraries, etc....to leave flyers in....Sooner rather than later, some big organizations will see we merit an investigation. They have their own independent labs, and scientists all over the world, and have loud lobbying voices, as well...Please anyone reading this, there is evidence that this is a chimera bacteria that has hyjacked our cells, much like our computers.....
 Please pay attention to the methods used to discredit us, the money being poured into news media that blows us off, and the people doing it....They have agendas that do not reflect the true nature of this entire group suffering....there are people selling vitamins, cremes, herbs, you name it, all with Morgellons attached to it...they are opportunists, but that is their capital right. Someone out there who has connections to members in any of the big groups that can come to our aid, please, make that phone call, get them here to this site and read how they are hell bent on breaking up the citizens afflicted and staving off lawsuits while they try to cover their butts. Anyone with a brain can see what manipulating is being done...and when was the last time you actually saw good honest reporting in the mainstream media....or a good KJV of the Holy Bible in a hotel room (RM!) So, we are not as pedigreed as some, however, we can think and deduct.....I think it would be a tragedy beyond human comprehension to see where this technology is going.....if we can do nothing at all but tell people, that is something!!!
Mm Can you hear me now???? Last edited by Maggie Mae on Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Process for revealing scammers. Present the truth, and ask them to validate their claims.
SPOKEN THE TRUTH AND STANDS BEHIND THIS STATEMENT 100% AS WELL AS I, DEENA STAND BEHIND THE TRUTH OF JESUS CHRIST, THE ONE AND ONLY SON OF GOD. AND BEWARE OF MICROSOFT INSTALLATIONS ON YOUR SYSTEM THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THE MICROSOFT CIRCLED LOGO I C FRANK BARFED BACK UP HIS DINNER THAT WAS CRAMMED DOWN HIS THROAT LAST NIGHT. I HAVE YET TO READ THE PAGES REPLACED FROM #589 UP....I CAN ONLY IMAGINE WHAT I WILL C AFTER THIS POST I SUBMIT. I KNOW THAT I MAKE MYSELF CLEAR HERE AND NOW I, DEENA...AGAIN, I AM FOR JESUS CHRIST ONLY.......CRYSTAL CLEAR BEAUTY OF TRUTH.
NAH....MAGNETICS
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy