Login

NLPModerator: BioTeam
17 posts • Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Putting all morality issues aside, and just putting the level of effectiveness on the table:
Humans make mistakes, so if you are being taught by an instructor on the correct weaponry usage, there's still a chance of error. It's like spreading rumors, all in the memory. Then you have the other technique: neuro-operation. Yes, there's also room for error during the operation, but if there is in fact a mistake, the person's life might be in danger. If the operation is indeed successful, then there'll be no forgetting-excuse on how to perform certain tasks (in our case, using a gun properly) because the skill is literally inside you. There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
Yes, this NLP technique would prove to be more effective if perfected. However, since the use of a method and its morality issue are two different things, I am still against the idea of teaching one skills through fixing one's brain.
There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
*nods*
Good, at least you understand this now. Just remember that the scientists in charge of working on this have a JOB to learn as much about this as possible. They want to learn, not to inflict mind control on everyone. Haha, that's the government's job to want to do that.
17 posts • Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |

© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy
Science Network - Braintrack.com - University Directory | Chemicool.com - Chemistry | EquationSheet.com - Equations | Logo design by LogoBee