Discussion of everything related to the Theory of Evolution.
then you have point 2 of deans
but for point 1
something needs to get to the gene to start the mutation ie virus radiation etc
so tell us the random process that gets the something ie virus radiation etc to the gene
Why aren't any of you talking about the sun?
It was there before any life on this planet began. You asked why mutations started in the first place. How about the idea that mutations are a tool for adaptation. The sun changes, the weather changes, gravitational forces change, atmospheric content changes, there are many changes. It seems that DNA is also subject to change. Actually it seems that everything is subject to change. Is that not what a mutation is, just a change.
Without change, there is extinction.
The real question is why does life matter so much to keep it going? Changes happen, we know how they happen and even in many cases where they originated from, but whats the point of this continuous adaptation through generations of lifeforms?
now that is some sort of explanation behind the random process that starts the mutation that leads to the generation of a new species
that is a lot more than canalon has offered - but then he want find explanations like that in his holy/sacred biology text books
all canalons books can tell us is what happen AFTER the starting process not BEFORE
This is explanation??? So what did we provide?
Cis or trans? That's what matters.
all those changes could/can be part of the random process that start mutations that generate new species
ie a virus was blown onto a gene
sun spots might have caused a lonely neutron to fly onto a gene
chemicals in the atmosphere might have fallen onto a gene
A mutation is a change in the genetic code. It does not start before the DNA is changed by chemical or other means. You do not make sense.
In fact the more you are trying to argue the more you are showing your complete ignorance of the subject at hand. I gave you a link to a place where you can go and instruct you for free. You chose instead to make a fool of yourself. Do not expect to be treated with any sort of respect. You deserved to be called an ignorant idiot, and you will be, you ignorant idiot.
Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)
a changed caused by ie a virus radiation via a random process a random process genetics cant explain
an example of such a random process which could start the mutation
"a virus was blown onto a gene" something is terribly odd with this statement
same with "sun spots might have caused a lonely neutron to fly onto a gene" well this one is just wrong. Neutrons cant move so freely without some kind of catastrophic effect
"chemicals in the atmosphere might have fallen onto a gene" why not, sounds pretty "ok"
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests