Evolution not supported by the facts

[oCShxckzZ]

http://www.chick.com/bc/1987/evolution.asp

Read this, you evolutionists (hopefully) will be surprised.

[canalon]

By what? The intense cherry picking? The absence of scientific reference, only anecdotes? The absence of context in your quotes? The brain melting absence of anything of interest in that blog?

[ughaibu]

http://www.chick.com/bc/1987/evolution.asp

Read this, you evolutionists (hopefully) will be surprised.

Evolution is observed to occur, this means that there is a fact of evolution. Within that fact, various phenomena of evolution are observed to occur, so there are facts of evolution. Accordingly, it's difficult to make sense of your title for this thread. If you mean that there is some specific theory of evolution which isn't supported by the facts of evolution, then you'll need to be clear about which theory that is and explain what you mean by it not being supported. Remember, theories of evolution are not conjectures of fact, they're explanatory models.

[Luxorien]

I see your Chick tract and raise you a talk.origins FAQ:

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/ce/3/part12.html

[keeblur]

"Equipping Christians for evangelism" pretty much throws any reasoning out the door.

[Gar]

I can't believe that people still try to deny natural selection. It is literally unbelievable.

[marquitosgm]

have you read this one?

On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life? By Ch. Darwin (1859)

Pure beauty.

[Jonl1408]

I would make a correction to the heading... "Proof" doesn't support the theory of Evolution. Facts can be interpreted wrongly, to mean anything you want them to. Proof is when the facts actually conclusively prove something.