Login

Join for Free!
114656 members


Evolution not supported by the facts

Discussion of everything related to the Theory of Evolution.

Moderator: BioTeam

Evolution not supported by the facts

Postby oCShxckzZ » Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:20 pm

http://www.chick.com/bc/1987/evolution.asp

Read this, you evolutionists (hopefully) will be surprised.
A Christian
oCShxckzZ
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:16 am

Postby canalon » Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:39 pm

By what? The intense cherry picking? The absence of scientific reference, only anecdotes? The absence of context in your quotes? The brain melting absence of anything of interest in that blog?
Patrick

Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)
User avatar
canalon
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Evolution not supported by the facts

Postby ughaibu » Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:58 am

oCShxckzZ wrote:http://www.chick.com/bc/1987/evolution.asp

Read this, you evolutionists (hopefully) will be surprised.
Evolution is observed to occur, this means that there is a fact of evolution. Within that fact, various phenomena of evolution are observed to occur, so there are facts of evolution. Accordingly, it's difficult to make sense of your title for this thread. If you mean that there is some specific theory of evolution which isn't supported by the facts of evolution, then you'll need to be clear about which theory that is and explain what you mean by it not being supported. Remember, theories of evolution are not conjectures of fact, they're explanatory models.
ughaibu
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:44 am


Postby Luxorien » Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:04 am

I see your Chick tract and raise you a talk.origins FAQ:

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/ce/3/part12.html
If arguing with people on the internet helps me understand science, then I will do it. FOR THE CHILDREN.
User avatar
Luxorien
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:27 am

Postby keeblur » Sun Mar 04, 2012 4:35 pm

"Equipping Christians for evangelism" pretty much throws any reasoning out the door.
User avatar
keeblur
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 12:18 pm

Re: Evolution not supported by the facts

Postby Gar » Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:01 am

I can't believe that people still try to deny natural selection. It is literally unbelievable.
Gar
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 1:52 am

Re: Evolution not supported by the facts

Postby marquitosgm » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:11 am

have you read this one?

On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life? By Ch. Darwin (1859)

Pure beauty.
marquitosgm
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:51 pm

Postby Jonl1408 » Thu Apr 05, 2012 4:32 pm

I would make a correction to the heading... "Proof" doesn't support the theory of Evolution. Facts can be interpreted wrongly, to mean anything you want them to. Proof is when the facts actually conclusively prove something.
"The scientific establishment bears a grisly resemblance to the Spanish Inquisition"-D. Gould
User avatar
Jonl1408
Death Adder
Death Adder
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:26 am
Location: South Carolina

Re: Evolution not supported by the facts

Postby RabbitPhilosopher » Sat Nov 09, 2013 10:32 pm

oCShxckzZ wrote:http://www.chick.com/bc/1987/evolution.asp

Read this, you evolutionists (hopefully) will be surprised.


The link you provide contains nothing but garden-variety objections to evolution based on gross misconceptions, ignorance and dishonesty. A user above even provided a link to talkorigins where they easily demolish the first three paragraphs of the article, they basically show the evolution deniers at chick.com are attempting to dupe their own readers with dishonesty. The rest of the article is equally laughable.

I will point out that chick.com is the website for Chick Publications (they publish the seemingly ubiquitous "This Was Your Life!" pamphlet) which is designated a hate group (yes a HATE group) by the Southern Poverty Law Group, http://www.splcenter.org/node/105/activegroups .
RabbitPhilosopher
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 9:00 pm


Return to Evolution

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron