Discussion of everything related to the Theory of Evolution.
I don’t know if our mental abilities are superior or inferior to the ones of our ancestors. I think there is an equal chance of either possibility. I am just tired of seeing our (human) vanity color interpretations of archeological data…
In this particular instance:
“our mental abilities are superior” = our brains are larger (presumably more complex) and evidence of tool complexity increases over time = therefore, our mental abilities improve (presumably our ancestors had to rely on tools for survival just as we do today), etc.
“our mental abilities are inferior” = our brains are larger (presumably more complexity hinders original function) and evidence of tool complexity increases over time = therefore, our mental abilities degenerate forcing increased reliance on tools (presumably our ancestors did NOT rely on tools for survival as we do today), etc. Note: this scenario presumes psychic abilities of our ancestors. I don’t know any evidence that would prove or disprove it…
The idea of superiority has always disgusted me. It has been one of the major problems of mankind throughout history.
Evolution cannot be directly observed, only indirectly.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 0 guests