Login

Join for Free!
119225 members


Applying Biological Concepts on the Earth

Discussion of the distribution and abundance of living organisms and how these properties are affected by interactions between the organisms and their environment

Moderator: BioTeam

Applying Biological Concepts on the Earth

Postby kk23wong » Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:17 pm

There are common characteristics among living things. By comparing them with the Earth, we will have a more concrete idea on how the eco-system (the “life-cycles” inside the planets) works. Thus, we can apply the biological concepts on the Earth to find out the validity of my hypothesis, “Planets are living objects”. The similarities among living things are clues to the living symptoms of the planets themselves. Planets themselves are alive, although their forms of existences and life expectancies are different from the living organisms inside. In fact, forms of existences vary among living things.

Other planets in our solar system are the “control experiments” of the Earth. The cross-references in-between the Earth and other planets (i.e. the Mars) will definitely contribute to breakthrough in our cosmology. My research will help us to find out the principles of natural mechanisms in our universe. The ages of the planets are obstacles in their comparisons. The aging of the planets is inevitable. The key elements are their ages. The end of the “life-cycles” of the planets resulted in extinctions of all living things inside the planets. The interchanges of chemical particles are almost unobservable in these planets because of their “life-cycles” have come to the end. Thus, the symptoms of lives and evidences of civilizations have been demolished by unknown causes on or before the end of their “life-cycles”. The ages of planets are rough speculations by the scientists only.

To begin with, I am going to put the focus on evaluating the Earth with biological theories in order to find out the similarities in-between the Earth and other living things. The applications of the biological theories on the Earth (e.g. reproduction) are essential. My hypothesis comes across various scientific subjects. Due to my limitations in the professionals for all of them, reviews on other scientific research are necessary. I am taking up this research as a lifetime project. Definitions of Living Things are controversial and closed associated with my hypothesis. The principle of “lives in different levels” is different from the “evolution of species”. Planets are conscious objects. In which, she (the God) is thinking in a unity. Her forms of presences take the lead in my hypothesis.

First, the “reconstruction” of the definitions of living things is my first approach. Plants (natural vegetations) acts like the organs inside our bodies. They are organic living tissues, so they cannot be defined as living things. Thus, definitions of living things have to be modified. Two branches come first in the definitions of living things: (1) Animals (2) Plants. Under my hypothesis, the Earth is a conscious living object. Plants are responsible for the interchanges of chemicals inside her body. They carried out the processes of “photosynthesis” which are necessary for her “life-cycles”. In which, their functions are necessary for maintaining the “life-cycles” of the Earth. They are not conscious. However, “animals” are her offspring. They are conscious. Therefore, “animals” are ‘living things”. Hence, the definitions of the living things changed. Plants are not conscious. They are only organic living tissues inside a planet, but the planet itself is CONCIOUS. Consciousness is the prerequisite for the definitions of living things. “Animals” are the offspring of the planet. They are conscious. Plants are not conscious because they are only the organic living tissues of the Earth. If the Earth is conscious, consciousness will become the ONLY definition of living things. Microorganisms are living tissues of the Earth. The planets are full of microorganisms when they are still alive, while there are not living organisms or microorganisms left after their life cycles have come to an end.

Second, the evaluation on the “evolution” is another approach. The combination of the theories of “evolution” will definitely help to explain the diversifications of the species. The Earth is the candle as well as the origin of lives. The activities of her offspring are influential to her “life-cycles”. The complexity of lives may have cohesions or even in the same progress of the “life-cycles” of our Earth. The simplicity of lives appeared in the beginning has gradually turned out to be much more complex forms of lives nowadays. The extinctions of all species must take place in the end of the “life-cycles” of the planets. The diversification of species in the beginning and it gradually turns out to be the extinctions of all species. Our civilization is one of the major triggers for the disturbances in the “life-cycle” of our planet. The cohesiveness in-between the “evolutions and extinctions of species” and the “live-cycles” of the planet need further researches. Under my hypothesis, planets carry out reproductions inside their bodies. To be more specific, the “evolution and extinction of species” may act as both the “life-cycles” and “reproductions” of the Earth. In the meantime, it proves the Earth has undergone a process of growth. She “grows” from simplicity into complex forms of lives. This approach aims at improving my hypothesis. Evolution is a process of “growth” of the Earth. It is a continuous process in her “life-cycles”. The Earth grow from simple into more complex forms of lives by both her reproduction (offspring) and her living tissues (plants). The transformation is the growth of the planet itself. It is a new idea in science.

I am going to develop my hypothesis in the directions above.

This is an innovation to biology as well as a completely new understanding of our universe.

Undoubtedly, my discovery has widened our horizons of our cosmology and renewed the definitions of living things.

What do you think? Biologists


Teru Wong
Use Smartphone to Find More Information On My Image
User avatar
kk23wong
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 3:53 pm
Location: Hong Kong, CN

Re: Applying Biological Concepts on the Earth

Postby EASTstroudsburg13 » Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:11 pm

Wow, this is a really new idea...

I just find it hard to believe that the Earth is living. How exactly does it "live"? Is it like life as we know it or a diferent kind that we haven't found out about yet? Because life as we know it would not fit Earth's characteristics, unless you know something I don't.
Science rules! :D

"Nothing says 'oops' like a wall of flame." -Marion Winik

Go Phillies!
Go Eagles!
User avatar
EASTstroudsburg13
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:52 pm
Location: East Stroudsburg, PA

Postby canalon » Thu Sep 24, 2009 1:51 am

Gaia hypothesis. Read about J. Lovelock...
Patrick

Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)
User avatar
canalon
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: Canada


Re:

Postby kk23wong » Fri Oct 02, 2009 6:05 am

canalon wrote:Gaia hypothesis. Read about J. Lovelock...


The EARTH is Conscious Living Objects.

Mine is an answer to Cosmology.

Deifnitions of lives
(1) "animals" & "plants" - Reproduction of the Earth. Consciousness because of a biological structure of brains. Offspring of the Earth is animals (all of us).
(2) "lives in different levels" Live & Death - evolution and extinction (in both science & philosophy) extended into planets (a highe form of lives).
(3) "microoragnism - evolution by both". Life cycles inside the Earth (planets).

Teru Wong
Use Smartphone to Find More Information On My Image
User avatar
kk23wong
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 3:53 pm
Location: Hong Kong, CN


Return to Ecology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest