The Colin Leslie Dean species paradox

[futurezoologist]

Gamila, please read up on:
-The origin(s) of life
-The evolutionary theory(especially separation of gene pools, evolutionary agents)
-Asexual reproduction

Then i think we will be on our way to having a great discussion.

[gamila]

just tell us
what the first bird mated with

[Zongo]

[AFJ]

It seems that on this issue most people are quite settled in their position. Some are atheistic or agnostic and hold to evolution. Some are ID but hold to evolution. Some are creationist. It seems logical to me that all of them take an element of generic faith. Because it has to do with the past there is no definitive proof either way.

I believe in God personally, not because a book says it's so, but because of what he's done for me personally and others I know, personally, both inwardly and outwardly. If there would no inward effect from the scriptures, no wisdom, no love, no spirit then I would view it as a story book. If there were no signs to confirm it's truth--and remember God is a sovereign Person and will give signs when and to whom he wants-- then I would view it as a book of fables.

What if God appeared to you and told you to tell your best friend something? Would he believe you? Probably not. What if your church prayed for say healing of cancer or some other disease several times and saw people be healed, or what if you began to see a pattern of positive results because these certain people pray? What if you saw people who were once selfish and hard change into sincere compassionate people? Even if you saw just one and he gave the credit to Christ? Wouldn't you at least give it a chance in your mind and heart?

[alextemplet]

Because it has to do with the past there is no definitive proof either way.

AFJ, you have made this statement several times and each time it has been disprove, yet you continue to cling to it. Would you please explain, if this sentence is true, why police departments continue to waste their money on forensics?

[Gavin]

Hi Colin. Remember me? We've met before. I see you have found another forum to pollute. I came across this forum quite by accident but quickly recognised you. Same old stuff, I see.

A note to the members of this forum: Colin (aka gamila) has been doing this sort of thing for years. He invariably gets banned, then moves on. You're just the latest. The guy's not stupid, just not quite all there, if you get my meaning. You're certainly free to continue with these "discussions" if:

1) you're stupid
2) not quite all there
3) have nothing better to do
4) am having fun

Back to you Colin: I'll be posting this message in all the threads you have started just to make sure that everyone knows what they are dealing with.

Till we meet again.

Gavin

[Zongo]

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index ... 757AAmcOKV

I couldn't make myself read it all the way through because whenever I do I feel my brain cells yell 'noooo' and die one by one.

[futurezoologist]

4) am having fun

Yip yip

[AstusAleator]

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090614055757AAmcOKV

I couldn't make myself read it all the way through because whenever I do I feel my brain cells yell 'noooo' and die one by one.

Hah! That's a fantastic quote. That person did a pretty good job of explaining the answer, too.

[MichaelXY]

Just because we do not understand somthing, it does not make something true or untrue. Only, we do not understand. It is our nature to seek the truth, and if we were to stop seeking the truth based on a book or doctrine, we would be denying ourselves of a possible truth and enlightenment of why we are here.

I fail to understand the antagonist that would rather not hear the truth.

[alextemplet]

Just because we do not understand somthing, it does not make something true or untrue. Only, we do not understand. It is our nature to seek the truth, and if we were to stop seeking the truth based on a book or doctrine, we would be denying ourselves of a possible truth and enlightenment of why we are here.

I fail to understand the antagonist that would rather not hear the truth.

The problem is when you get people who think truth can only be defined by what is written in their book.

[gamila]

The problem is when you get people who think truth can only be defined by what is written in their book.

so what did the first bird mate with