Login

|
|
reverse-evolutionModerator: BioTeam
10 posts • Page 1 of 1
reverse-evolutioncan we reverse the evolutionary changes even in lab-model base,i.e.complex organism to simpler ones?
DR.AJOY KR. DAS
Shortly, no.
You can lose feature, but usually what appears "reverse evolution" is merely the evolution going on. And the now useless feature lost will have left some trace at a level or another in the organism. Patrick
Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without any proof. (Ashley Montague)
and even if you are able to get an organism to the exact morphology and genotype its ancestor had, this is still not a "reversal" because evolution is not directional any more than time itself is directional. Just because I can stand at point a, then move to point b, and then back to point a, doesn't mean I've reversed time and gone back to point a.
What did the parasitic Candiru fish say when it finally found a host? - - "Urethra!!"
Re: reverse-evolution
complex organisms to simpler ones? However I hate using the word "complex" and "simpler" when talking about evolution because those two words are both relative and depends almost strictly on the environment. There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one from so simple a beginning.....The Origin of Species
If you look at the evolution of lactic acid bacteria, you'll see that it's been shedding a lot of it's genes
Living one day at a time;
Enjoying one moment at a time; Accepting hardships as the pathway to peace; ~Niebuhr
Aside from the semantic issues anyone might have with the bacteria becoming "simpler":
Much of the genetic material in animal's genomes is "junk" DNA, and shedding it doesn't change a thing. Mith is this the kind of DNA being shed by the bacteria?
No actually, it's because LAB grows in a very rich medium(milk and animal guts) so it can discard a lot of it's ancestral genes related to amino acid synthesis or other nutrients and instead incorporate transporters.
Living one day at a time;
Enjoying one moment at a time; Accepting hardships as the pathway to peace; ~Niebuhr
Echinoderms like sea stars are said to have evolved to be simpler since there adult form is radial (seeming simpler) but their larval form is bilateral (... more complex).
Also if something like marine mammals are thought to have evolved to land, then evolved back into the sea could maybe be seen as backwards evolution. But that is just a phrase where it isn't truly backwards evolution. It isn't even adapted to the ocean in the same way.
Man in civilization surveys the creature through the glass of his knowledge and sees thereby a feather magnified and the whole image in distortion. - Henry Benson
10 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy
Science Network - Braintrack.com - University Directory | Chemicool.com - Chemistry | Logo design by LogoBee | Powered by phpBB