Login

|
|
Chargaff's basesModerator: BioTeam
16 posts • Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
about chargaff's ruleI don't think it can really happen like what Victor proposed.
Because it might ruin the whole structure of the 2 strands. Deletion may happen but should rid bases of the both strands to maintain complementary pairing structure. Am I right? please comment. Anyway, what he said was quite impressive.
Re: about chargaff's rule
Because of tautomerism an A can form a rare imino tautomer which can bind to C which is stable and occurs in DNA. Tautomerism occurs 1 to 10^4 bases. During incorporation a C can be bound to the A*, when A is in the imino form. During the next replication it can retautomerize to the normal A and than a T is incorporated, but on the other strand, because a C was bound, the A is replaced by a G. This is complex chemistry though. The same can happen when the mutagen 5-bromouracil is precent. Normally U will bind A, but 5-bromouracil i=can tautomerize to a so-called enol form which has a higher frequence. It binds a G instead of A. Therefore during the next replication instead of an AT-couple a CG-couple is made.
16 posts • Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy
Science Network - Braintrack.com - University Directory | Chemicool.com - Chemistry | Logo design by LogoBee | Powered by phpBB