natural selection

by **James** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 1:50 am

Yes that's correct, they are unicellular eukaryotes.

by **sunnygirl** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:21 am

my tet book mentins old world monkeys and new world monkeys but doesnt go any furthur into what the difference beeen the two are. Do you by any chance know?

by **canalon** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:23 am

This link should help:
http://anthro.palomar.edu/primate/

by **sunnygirl** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:59 am

So Apes wuld be more closely relatd to the old world monkeys correct?

by **alextemplet** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 4:56 pm

sunnygirl wrote:So Apes wuld be more closely relatd to the old world monkeys correct?

yes

by **sunnygirl** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:10 pm

Excellent Im Learning Something!!!!! ha ha ha

by **alextemplet** » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:57 pm

sunnygirl wrote:Excellent Im Learning Something!!!!! ha ha ha

Learning is always fun. :wink:

by **sunnygirl** » Wed Aug 02, 2006 8:34 pm

Yes I love to learn something new

Question:
Some humans have opposable big toes whish function like thumbs. This allows them to grasp objects very strongly with their feet. For modern humans though, this trait isnt very useful. What kind of structure are these toes?

by **James** » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:13 pm

I'm not sure of the term, maybe just non-opposable?

by **sunnygirl** » Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:04 am

I discovered what the term is off of another web site.

The opposable toes would be considered vestigial structures.

natural selection

Who is online