The question of life...

by **biostudent84** » Tue Apr 05, 2005 8:06 pm

Ever do Logic problems? Modus Tollens, Law of Contrapositives, ect.

Definitions are sets standardized facts that the scientific community created. They are also the most difficult to refute. If you can find a definition that supports your ideas, it makes your ideas much more credible.

by **MrMistery** » Wed Apr 06, 2005 8:24 pm

Nobody ever believes me anyway...

It is just my nature guys, don't mind me. I do not like to get trapped in words and defs.
I need action, i need the spark..
That is why i want the nobel

by **biostudent84** » Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:09 pm

MrMistery wrote:Nobody ever believes me anyway...
It is just my nature guys, don't mind me. I do not like to get trapped in words and defs.
I need action, i need the spark..
That is why i want the nobel

Haha, let's just wait. Maybe you'll get it for redefining the definition of life.

by **2810712** » Thu Apr 07, 2005 6:44 am

So, what is the inference here :
1] those who hate deff.s hate biosystematics
2] those who love logic like it
3]Those who hate biosystematics will to get nobel :shock:

I like both logic and nobel, where do i fit then ? ? ?

:idea:

Presently , if we just continue like this, nobody is going to let us fight for nobel .

hrushikesh

by **cytochromeP** » Fri Apr 08, 2005 8:01 am

"Scientists animated by the purpose of proving that they are purposeless constitute an interesting subject for study".
- by i-dunno-who-said-it

by **2810712** » Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:33 am

Is this all in vein :cry:

???

hrushikesh

by **biostudent84** » Fri Apr 08, 2005 2:02 pm

2810712 wrote:Is this all in vein ???

Kinda like your efforts while quitting heroin?

by **2810712** » Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:40 am

ya , people quiting heroin mostly don't think about their body , they quit because they are made to realise that they must have some ethics :wink:

hrushikesh

by **biostudent84** » Sat Apr 09, 2005 11:32 am

Lol, it was a reference to an old George Carlin joke. "I tried quitting heroin, but my efforts were all in vein."

by **MrMistery** » Sat Apr 09, 2005 6:48 pm

Good one Kyle...
I'm glad to see that those who hate biosystematics will get the nobel

by **2810712** » Sun Apr 10, 2005 2:12 pm

No. they will to get nobel, read that carefully.

hrushikesh

by **dr.pnj** » Sat Apr 16, 2005 12:14 pm

life started with bubblig chemicals
do you know that99% of all species that exited on earth some time ofr the other are extinct today
the value of life is as determined by nature
darwins thoery of natural selection
nature takes the best and leaves the rest
it values only the"best" for survival
the "rest"get killed
htere is nothing philosophical about it
if amoeba is stronger than man it will survive long after the human species becomes extinct or vice versa
the value of life--- size does not matter
and evenif it does the cockroach is a more successful oraganism than us
the dinosours were most successful
they dominated the earth for75 million years waay before humans even existed or

The question of life...

Quote

the question of life

Who is online