Login

|
|
Natural selection ends in absurdity or nonsenseModerator: BioTeam
27 posts • Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: Natural selection ends in absurdity or nonsense
Either Futuyma is wrong or your interpretation of Futuyma is wrong and I don't care which it is, or how many google sites quote him.
Re: Natural selection ends in absurdity or nonsense
this takes us right back to the thread we have a definition of NS ie Futuyma now you dont like that definition as it turns NS into nonsense so you want accept it thus when even definitions are based on subjective value laden ideas is even more evidence that NS is nothing but subjective value laden concepts- and you call NS a science all you do is twik things when they dont fit your preconceived ideas-and you call NS a science in anthropology that is called "secondary elaborations"
Re: Natural selection ends in absurdity or nonsenseBang away, guys.
Re: Natural selection ends in absurdity or nonsenseok ok lets cool it down. NS does decrease the BAD gene frequencies, why shouldnt it. But guess what, in our universe mutations happen ok, it just does, and those genes come back up so all in all the frequency tries remain as it is.
Re: Natural selection ends in absurdity or nonsense
Ad Hominem - Bye.
Re: Natural selection ends in absurdity or nonsense
wrong harnfull genes are common -read the thread for the evidence
Re: Natural selection ends in absurdity or nonsenselets keep on track the thread is about NS being nonsense
Re: Natural selection ends in absurdity or nonsenseyou are kind of arguing with yourself now arent you
Re: Natural selection ends in absurdity or nonsenseOkay, for the moment take it that I'm persuaded by your argument. What is your theory of inheritance?
Re: Natural selection ends in absurdity or nonsenseThere are many definition/s of natural selection:
This is yours:
Compare that to all of these definitions from science websites on the internet many of which contradict eachother, the truth is nobody knows how to define natural selection, selection occurs but "natural selection" is a very abstract concept.
Re: Natural selection ends in absurdity or nonsense
all that shows is NS is a subjective and value laden thing where is even the definition subjective and value laden
thus NS ends in absurdity and nonsense
Re: Natural selection ends in absurdity or nonsenseSo, are you proposing an alternative theory of inheritance?
27 posts • Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests |
© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy