Login

Join for Free!
118252 members


Oh God, a debate!

Discussion of everything related to the Theory of Evolution.

Moderator: BioTeam

Oh God, a debate!

Postby hickchick1981 » Sun Apr 01, 2012 2:13 am

I'm a graduate student stuck in a class where we do debates. I don't like debating with people any way, and on top of that -- I had to sign up to debate a topic I don't agree with.

I have to pretend like I don't think that evolution should be studied in the lab because it can never possibly emulate the natural world...I've worked over six years doing lab research. I'm all about labs. I can't think of a single reason why anyone would say that selection experiments in labs are meaningless, and I can't find any articles to support this lame point of view.

Do any of you guys know of any studies that have been done in the last ten years where they found supportive evidence for why evolution should not be emulated in the lab?

Thank you all!

--S
hickchick1981
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 2:04 am

Re: Oh God, a debate!

Postby wbla3335 » Sun Apr 01, 2012 2:47 am

No.
wbla3335
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:20 am

Re: Oh God, a debate!

Postby AstraSequi » Sun Apr 01, 2012 8:49 am

I gather this is not a science class. :)

Are you asked to argue that nobody should do the experiments because evolution experiments cannot emulate the natural world? This is not something you can argue for based on scientific information or papers - it can be easily shown to be false by experiment. And since all experiments have at least some artificial conditions, for consistency I think you would have to argue against the use of the experimental method in general.

Also, are you arguing specifically about application to the natural world? Directed evolution often is not meant to emulate the natural world, and it produces clear benefits as a bioengineering technique.


I understand that in formal debates, if you are assigned a position you do not agree with or think is indefensible, you should introduce into it nuances that are not in the literal text of the debating prompt, thus reframing the debate in more favourable terms - that would be my advice (just remember to spell out your exact position very clearly at the beginning).

This is, of course, not done in science (and you're never assigned a position in the first place anyways, as I'm sure you know) - but I could imagine arguing something like "we should be more aware of the limitations of selection experiments" instead. Or "we should not run selection experiments on specific kinds of animals," referring specifically to mammals, primates, animals above a certain intelligence, etc (not that anyone is doing this), and you can give reasons of feasibility and ethics. Or you could just argue for the opposing position, so long as you are confident enough and can add to the discussion beyond what they will say. :)
AstraSequi
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:14 am


Postby JackBean » Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:42 am

Yep, that's the risk of debate classes.
http://www.biolib.cz/en/main/

Cis or trans? That's what matters.
User avatar
JackBean
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
 
Posts: 5678
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:12 pm

Postby Darby » Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:15 pm

You could go with the approach that if the aim is to present convincing evidence to the public, studies on adaptation in bacteria just can't connect. Don't attack the process or the evidence, but the perception of the evidence...
Darby
Viper
Viper
 
Posts: 1262
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 5:29 pm
Location: New York, USA

Postby Jonl1408 » Thu Apr 05, 2012 4:20 pm

The thing is Evolution can't be proven... It has never been witnessed, only cases of adaptation have ever been witnessed.
"The scientific establishment bears a grisly resemblance to the Spanish Inquisition"-D. Gould
User avatar
Jonl1408
Death Adder
Death Adder
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:26 am
Location: South Carolina

Postby JackBean » Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:39 pm

You're right, but existence of God has been proved so many times :roll:
http://www.biolib.cz/en/main/

Cis or trans? That's what matters.
User avatar
JackBean
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
 
Posts: 5678
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:12 pm

Re: Oh God, a debate!

Postby Jonl1408 » Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:28 am

I never said that. Neither can be proven, using evidence. I know that God exists, because I have a personal relationship with Him, not because the evidence proved his existence. Although there are millions of evidences for God's existence.
"The scientific establishment bears a grisly resemblance to the Spanish Inquisition"-D. Gould
User avatar
Jonl1408
Death Adder
Death Adder
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:26 am
Location: South Carolina

Postby JackBean » Wed May 16, 2012 12:52 pm

You're saying that. I have seen none.
http://www.biolib.cz/en/main/

Cis or trans? That's what matters.
User avatar
JackBean
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
 
Posts: 5678
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:12 pm

Re: Oh God, a debate!

Postby animartco » Mon May 21, 2012 12:02 am

Surely if you don't agree with a topic you oppose it. That is what debating is all about! A hint. Instead of trying to prove that your findings are significant in evolutionary terms, make them explain why they think they aren't!
animartco
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:56 pm

Postby AstraSequi » Mon May 21, 2012 7:05 am

Instead of trying to prove that your findings are significant in evolutionary terms, make them explain why they think they aren't!

That would be like saying "you can't prove me wrong, therefore I'm right." This kind of argument is already used far too often. :)
AstraSequi
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:14 am

Postby JorgeLobo » Mon May 21, 2012 2:58 pm

True astrasequi - but debate is not science. Taht's why it is so silly for scientists to engage in debate on the subject of evolution.
JorgeLobo
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:12 am

Next

Return to Evolution

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests