Login

|
|
Plant evolution.Moderator: BioTeam
20 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Plant evolution.Hi,
I was just wondering if anyone new why plants have not evolved to use the energetic ultra-violet wavelengths of light in photosynthesis. I would really appreciate a quick response. Thanks, Zenn.
I think it's because their chlorophyll are for red (chlorophyll a) and green-blue (chlorophyll b). Beside, ultra-violet wavelength is much more shorter than those two and again, ultra-violet ray is harmful because of its radiation that can cause mutation of cells.
Q: Why are chemists great for solving problems?
A: They have all the solutions.
For further information, please search for yourself in google or yahoo since the info above is not the detail one.
Cheers, / 'vikte / Q: Why are chemists great for solving problems?
A: They have all the solutions.
As victor said, it has to do with the molecular properties of the chlorophile molecule. Plus, ultraviolet is only 9% of the light, and most of it is blocked by the ozone layer, so such an evolutionary step would be pointless
"As a biologist, I firmly believe that when you're dead, you're dead. Except for what you live behind in history. That's the only afterlife" - J. Craig Venter
Ozone layer is 'bleeding' now because many use of CHCl3 (chloroform), freon, etc....so, I think it'd be possible now...
Hey Andrew, since this post is shown, I saw your total posts and the number is exactly the same with my country's independence year (1945)... Q: Why are chemists great for solving problems?
A: They have all the solutions.
Even with the use of cloroflorocarbs, the ozone layer only bleeds where the temperature in the upper stratosphere is low enough. if the uv light gets through, there will be no more plants.
PS: I have more posts than your indepence year, victor "As a biologist, I firmly believe that when you're dead, you're dead. Except for what you live behind in history. That's the only afterlife" - J. Craig Venter
Well, just hope that "thrombocytes" will prevent the "bleeding"..
Hey, I've ever heard this theory but why they don't have it applied in life? now, world can make O2 by electrolysis of H2O. then this O2 can be made into O3 (ozon) trough process called electrical bow process (IMMSMR). so: O2 ---electric bow--> O3 This O3 can be released to the stratosphere, but, why they don't do it??? Q: Why are chemists great for solving problems?
A: They have all the solutions.
1- Atmospheric ozone is toxic. It is a pollutant. 2- Production of O3 this way cost a lot of energy, that won't help with global warming 3- It is not exactly easy to send enough O3 in the stratosphere you know... They a re talking about billion tons of the stuff that you would have to send a few kilometers above where you are making it. Needs a lot of pipes Patrick
...I think they will do anything to prevent that...now it's proven that I was wrong..
Q: Why are chemists great for solving problems?
A: They have all the solutions.
Space cargo? You mean to send it via a space shuttle? That is absurd... Or it sounds so anyway...
"As a biologist, I firmly believe that when you're dead, you're dead. Except for what you live behind in history. That's the only afterlife" - J. Craig Venter
20 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy