Discussion of everything related to the Theory of Evolution.
Shell of the crab is PART of the crab. Same as horns, claws, ect. are parts of other animals. Can you take away part of environment and make them die? Of course you can. My point is our environment is essentially artificial. We are too dependent on it by now to be capable of easy transition into natural environment should something happen to our artificial one.
"Man is a singular creature. He has a set of gifts which make him unique among the animals: so that, unlike them, he is not a figure in the landscape - he is a shaper of the landscape."
-Jacob Bronowski, The Ascent of Man
If arguing with people on the internet helps me understand science, then I will do it. FOR THE CHILDREN.
My point is that Molecular Evolution (proven part) = genetic deterioration over time. Therefore, extrapolating that to organisms should mean starting with nearly immortal and highly adaptable (=more genetically robust) organisms and ending with organism of a relatively short lifespan with highly limited ability to adapt. I am talking about humans and our evolution.
This report, which I did on the IV INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE "ideological basis and scientific evidence for intelligent design in the genesis of life and the universe"
Life: the active situational model on the cell membrane, equipped with a polypeptide-nucleic technology
(https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =1&theater - )
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests