THE DARWINIST "ATHEISTS" TECHNIQUES OF CLAMOR AND DEMAGOGUER

[JackBean]

did I respond to you? Maybe try to read whole post (including quote) next time.

[JackBean]

since you deleted the reaction, I guess I can delete whole post, so that you are not embarrassed, right?

[JackBean]

One does not even identify himself as moderator or staff

so, now I'm "one"? The one-whose-name-should-not-be-written
What would that change? Would you act nicer in front of me, not arguing with me?

[Crucible]

since you deleted the reaction, I guess I can delete whole post, so that you are not embarrassed, right?

No need to delete. I misread. I asked what you were talking about. I immediately deleted that. So what ? I made a mistake. No need to delete, Jack. You can now claim that you caught me making a mistake.

[Crucible]

One does not even identify himself as moderator or staff

so, now I'm "one"? The one-whose-name-should-not-be-written
What would that change? Would you act nicer in front of me, not arguing with me?

Surely, being a hidden mod encourages the member to respond as if being attacked by a mere "member", and not as he might if he were being attacked or prodded by a member clearly identified as staff.

[Crucible]

Maybe a little sign saying "Moderator in training - keep a safe distance" ?
That's a joke. However, it is disturbing ( to me) that mods both engage in aggressive behaviour and then take any moderator action.

It's bad enough that staff would be insulting to any members , "right out of the box".

What we have then is a fighting referee, who cannot ever lose. Add the "unmarked" status, and it's something that could be improved upon.

[JackBean]

since you deleted the reaction, I guess I can delete whole post, so that you are not embarrassed, right?

No need to delete. I misread. I asked what you were talking about. I immediately deleted that. So what ? I made a mistake. No need to delete, Jack. You can now claim that you caught me making a mistake.

I don't need that. That's yours (plural) way.

Did I ban someone because he was arguing with me? Did I ban you, because you're giving me pain with the saltiness? Did I ban scottie because he refused to respond? No. No. No. I have warned him 3-times, so he cannot complain he didn't know.

If two years are training for you... I wouldn't want to be your employer.

Anyway, I have contacted honee_v to have a look around so I will (try to) be silent until she tells me her opinion.

[Crucible]

It's not that this is a poor forum, by any means. It needs a bit of attention to some details.

It's not great, IMO, to have activism/zealotry showing from staff. It does a disservice.

[scottie]

I messaged honey_v as recommended.
I have not been granted the courtesy of even an acknowledgement let alone a response.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Complaint about a moderators behavior
Sent: Sun Nov 06, 2011 4:10 pm
From: scottie
To: honee_v scottie

Dear Vicki Mozo,
May I draw your attention once again to the behavior of one of the moderators jackbean.

He has referred me to you.

He has locked the thread “ Theories – Origin of Life” once again, his reason this time is that I have not answered his questions.

I have repeatedly attempted to answer all questions posed to me, he just does not acknowledge the answers.

I have done nothing but post science on this forum. The papers I have referred to have all been from the scientific establishment. The majority peer reviewed.

My complaint is that he is deliberately shutting down debate that he is unable to cope with scientifically.

Would you kindly inform me, if dissent from a moderators view is not acceptable on this forum as that appears to be the approach that this moderator is taking.

My thanks in advance for your investigation into this.

Sincerely

scottie

[JackBean]

1) I didn't lock the thread again
2) you didn't respond, where did the humans come from and some others questions, you have just ignored them
(interestingly, when you had a response for question, you didn't bother to respond again, but when you have none, I did not acknowledge the answer)

[scottie]

1) I didn't lock the thread again

You as usaul need to get your facts straight. Below are your own words.

by JackBean » Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:07 pm

Too bad, I was hoping this will fall away into the past, but you are obviously too bored, aren't you?

You're permanently insulting your oponents for lack of biology knowledge and bad English. I was sarcastic to you because of your lack of simple logic, little bit of imagination, comprehention of your oponent's arguments and overall lack of ability to discuss.
Yeah, I have locked the topic. If you have problem with that, forward it upwards (the nick of moderator is honee_v).

Not only that but my username and password became unrecognisable to the forum until I complained and then suddenly I had access again.

Now your second point

you didn't respond, where did the humans come from

What is it about the meaning of the word design that you don't understand.
I have spent about 130 posts arguing that and it hasn't dawned on you yet?

Am I expected to answer every silly question of yours. Is this part of the forum rules?

[canalon]

Scottie:

The keyword above would have been again. After the thread was unlocked by another mod, Jackbean did not try to supersede that decision.
Your logging problem was a forum glitch that lasted a day and kept me away too for no reason, but did not affect all users. Not a ban, if that was the case you would have been notified that you had been banned and why, or anything targeted at you. S**t happens.
As for your behaviour, you have been asked multiple times direct questions to clarify some of your positions that you have completely ignored. And you have just posted you logorrheic tripe over and over again. You are not here to discuss or debate, just to lecture and enjoy the pleasure of reading yourself. And yet all your posts are still there, and your members privileges have never been discussed, just one thread that was going nowhere has been temporarily closed. Cry me a river, but you can take your persecution complex and shove it where the sun never shines, nobody ever persecuted you. But maybe one day you will find that after all, the patience of the mods do have some limits. Not that your loss by ban or by your own volition, considering your activity in other threads, would create a massive loss for the community, eh?