Login

|
|
Flaws of Life in a TubeModerator: BioTeam
42 posts • Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Re: Flaws of Life in a TubeAs I and others have said, debate with ignorant people is futile and not worth our time.
Re: Flaws of Life in a TubeWhen Miller died, scientists reexamined the preserved original vials from the experiment, and they found more than 20 different amino acids.
what is your view on these articles I found recently? The original box containing archived spark discharge samples prepared by Stanley Miller in 1958. For unknown reasons, Miller never analyzed these even though this is his first experiment using hydrogen sulfide. In the new research, the team analyzed samples from another variant of the experiment performed in 1958 in which Miller used carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide gas in the mixture. It was "lost" for decades because, for unknown reasons, Miller never reported his analysis of the results. Stanley mentioned to several of us that he hated working with hydrogen sulfide because it smelled so bad and tended to make him sick," says Bada. "Given that some of the compounds he made in the experiment smell pretty bad, this experiment may be the basis for his reluctance to deal with H2S in experiments."
Patrick
Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without any proof. (Ashley Montague)
42 posts • Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy